Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looper


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

We watched Monday night... I had gotten it, along with Beasts of the Southern Wild (GREAT MOVIE), Amazing Spiderman, and Ted from Redbox on Sunday...

I liked it... The slower parts were kind of slow, and I knew (kind of) how it would end SPOILER TO FOLLOW:

I thought Bruce Willis was going to kill the Rainmaker's mom and JGL was going to kill BW... basically justifying the future hate that led the Rainmaker to start killing off all the Loopers, pretty much making the entire movie pointless because things would just have the same future despite all the efforts to save the kid. I guess I should have saw through that and realized that they'd make JGL go all hero to save the day...

I picked up on a lot of Terminator feel to this movie, but I'd give it a 7/10...

If you liked this and haven't already seen it, check out the movie In Time...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was In Time the Justin Timberlake movie?

If so, I was also seriously disappointed with that one. Time travel is a very touchy concept and you have to close all the gaps for the audience. That's why Terminator and Back to the Future were so awesome, they did it pretty masterfully.

With In Time, it's been awhile since I saw it, but again, it started off with a great premise and it seemed like it just got bogged down in details the further along it went. It felt like it went off the rails once they started turning into "time Robin Hoods," lol, at least for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah it was Timberlake...

It wasn't really about time travel at all... People stopped aging at 25, and any time they lived after that was based on the amount of time they earned or received from others. Time was basically the currency, and the rich could live for millions of years if they wanted (while remaining their 25 year old self).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah it was Timberlake...

It wasn't really about time travel at all... People stopped aging at 25, and any time they lived after that was based on the amount of time they earned or received from others. Time was basically the currency, and the rich could live for millions of years if they wanted (while remaining their 25 year old self).

Oh, I didn't mean to lump that in with time travel... My bad, I was still thinking about Looper.

As far as In Time, yeah, like I said, I really liked the premise... I just feel like they got lost in the details and then things lost their meaning once he turned Bonnie and Clyde with the big wig's daughter.

I will also say, I have no idea how JT didn't impregnate his own mother at the beginning. She was HAWT, and I was angry when she died, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...