Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

No minority head coaches were hired with 8 openings


Deebo

Recommended Posts

When is this mentality going to change in the NFL.....its 2013 and we still dont give minority coaches a chance....currently there are 4 minority coaches out of 32....even with superbowls wins and appearance by black head coaches and GMs

thoughts fellas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm in support of the rooney rule. i think it's important in a good-ol'-boy structure (which fits NFL owners to a tee) to make sure there are systems in place to eradicate any leftover prejudices from an era where that sort of thing was a social norm and accepted behavior.

however, given the diversity of minorities in head coaching and front office positions around the league, i'd say this is an anomaly. i'm open to being challenged otherwise, but i don't think there's anything to see here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If black players dominate the league, it is not because they are black, it is because the talent evaluators feel that they give the team the best chance to win. The same talent evaluators select the coaches. The coach that give the team the best chance to win is hired--if he is black, white, or hispanic. I would hope that a minority would want a job because he is the most qualified, not because some stupid quota forced a team to hire him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nfl already made a statement.

Here's what NFL Exec VP of Human Resources Robert Gulliver had to say in reaction to questions about the league's hiring practices for head coaches and GMs: "While there has been full compliance with the interview requirements of the Rooney Rule and we wish the new head coaches and general managers much success, the hiring results this year have been unexpected and reflect a disappointing lack of diversity. The Rooney Rule has been a valuable tool in expanding diversity and inclusion in hiring practices, but there is more work to do, especially around increasing and strengthening the pipeline of diverse candidates for head coach and senior football executive positions. We have already started the process of developing a plan for additional steps that will better ensure more diversity and inclusion on a regular basis in our hiring results. We look forward to discussing these steps with our advisers to ensure that our employment, development and equal opportunity programs are both robust and successful."

about 4 hours ago

NFL statement on hiring practices: http://sulia.com/channel/football/f/fe1f7b52-2df4-47ef-a9a9-0383bfab4122/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If black players dominate the league, it is not because they are black, it is because the talent evaluators feel that they give the team the best chance to win. The same talent evaluators select the coaches. The coach that give the team the best chance to win is hired--if he is black, white, or hispanic. I would hope that a minority would want a job because he is the most qualified, not because some stupid quota forced a team to hire him.

I agree with your main point but those players genetics do have a huge impact on their dominance and being black is a part of that. So I read "black" in these cases as "genetically gifted" knowing that skin color itself is irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i believe this is all bullshit. nfl coaching is a fraternity. they stick with who they know, and that's it. it has nothing to do with whether you are black or white. it has everything to do with who you know. breaking into the nfl in general is hard enough as it is unless you're a chick that wants to be in the public relations dept. on its face, it isn't racism; it's cronyism. if it has a disparate impact on minorities, it's because nfl organizations want to keep it "all in the family," so to speak, not because they want to keep minorities out.

whether or not having minority coaches is a good thing is another issue. i, for one, think it would be. but turning all this into a race relations stunt is ludicrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm in support of the rooney rule. i think it's important in a good-ol'-boy structure (which fits NFL owners to a tee) to make sure there are systems in place to eradicate any leftover prejudices from an era where that sort of thing was a social norm and accepted behavior.

however, given the diversity of minorities in head coaching and front office positions around the league, i'd say this is an anomaly. i'm open to being challenged otherwise, but i don't think there's anything to see here.

This is about as real as you can get folks. For all the reasons you gave supporting the Rooney Rule are exactly the same reasons why i find it offensive and a joke. I'm an amputee, and if someone more qualified than I, were to be passed over for a position just so a company could say they hired the handicapped guy(while i would still take the job) I have to say i would feel ashamed as if i didn't earn my station.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim Harbaugh and Pete Carroll can coach. Teams will hire the best coach for the job. If there was a coach who was a minority who could coach like Harbaugh, Carroll or Belichik, he would be hired immediately.

Also I don't see why there is a discussion when too many coaches are white but you never here a discussion about too many players being black or too many owners being Jewish.

The word is 'minority'. It's not a surprise that a minority of the coaches are minorities.

I'm not going to bother researching it but I would guess there is accurate representation of minority coaches (compared to the population of the United States). I would also guess that the white coaches who have been hired recently have done a good job (Fox, Carroll, Harbaugh, Shanahan come to mind the past few years).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with your main point but those players genetics do have a huge impact on their dominance and being black is a part of that. So I read "black" in these cases as "genetically gifted" knowing that skin color itself is irrelevant.

some would say this statement is racist. all would say it is stereotyping. those same people are bitching about no minority head coaches being hired. you have to be careful deciding which side you're on, and subsequently how you argue that side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

some would say this statement is racist. all would say it is stereotyping. those same people are bitching about no minority head coaches being hired. you have to be careful deciding which side you're on, and subsequently how you argue that side.

Racist as hatred? Or racist as in acknowledging genetic differences? Because I'm fairly certain I don't hate anyone for something that is far and away from something they could control.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Racist as hatred? Or racist as in acknowledging genetic differences? Because I'm fairly certain I don't hate anyone for something that is far and away from something they could control.

yeah, i wasn't calling you racist. i was more just highlighting the ignorance of the people who are out there shouting from the rooftops that the nfl is racist. nothing personal. you just happen to illustrate a point i was trying to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah, i wasn't calling you racist. i was more just highlighting the ignorance of the people who are out there shouting from the rooftops that the nfl is racist. nothing personal. you just happen to illustrate a point i was trying to make.

I see what you mean repped :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thielen was a "dawg" like Dan Morgan likes to say. And they replaced him with puppies.  The analytics are probably saying this is more targets for younger receivers they are hoping to develop, specifically the first round pick from 2025. The eye test is going to show a very inexperienced group of WRs that are going to have some serious growing pains, for a 3rd year QB who has not yet proven to be the guy going forward.  It's crazy how in the literal first game of his NFL career, Cam Newton showed everyone he was a star QB and there was never any doubt about that. It almost didn't even matter who was around him, although he definitely had a serious lack of talent at WR for most of his career. Bryce is going into his third season and there is still a ton of doubt, and who is around him is seen as crucial for him to have success. I don't like it. 
    • Everyone says AT was old and slow but the one thing he could do consistently was get separation. That takes skill and it's been a huge issue in our WR for years. And while Moore may be a great locker room guy and our WR coach may be a 12 year vet, he's not playing in the game. Vets like AT do what they do because they can see things others don't and exploit it. The DB interview I mentioned before was with Stephon Gilmore after his DPOY season. He was pulling the younger DBs aside showing them things you wouldn't even think you'd be able to tell from the way the receiver was standing.  Seeing what a DB or LB is biting on in game that can give you that half step advantage is huge and we don't have that experience in our WR group right now and I think it could end up hurting us. None of our receivers have lined up against NFL corners successfully on a regular basis. Having someone that can walk over and give you a tip to get a half yard separation can be a difference maker. 
    • We only fielded about 4 NFL calibre players on that unit last year. 
×
×
  • Create New...