Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistic off-season trade scenarios


BigBeezy

Recommended Posts

see if the raiders will take on the contract of one of the guys we will potentially cut (beason, gamble, dwill, ect.) and trade him straight up for terrelle pryor. most came-like backup we are going to find (obviously he is NOT cam), and would give us another offensive weapon to play around with. him and cam are the same age, so he's young enough to groom. it serves as SOME value where little else is available. if armanti was pryors size, he would already be the backup and we'd have traded clausen for a can of pringles last season...add pickles to the pryor trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is absolutely nothing realistic about those two scenarios.

Well run franchises don't trade talented players at crucial positions for the likes of RBs and LBs (especially injured ones) because of how easy it is to find good players in those positions working at your local Food Lion down the road. Hence the reason we have such a surplus-they're easy to scout and the previous regime didn't want to take chances on players that could possibly *GASP!* bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brandon Marshall fetched 2 3rd round picks. If you're wanting a realistic trade for Nicks, it probably involves us giving up our 2nd round pick this year.

His cap hit is around 2.5 million next year, but then he becomes a FA and could be looking for big money that we may not have. Giving up a 2nd, while having to give out a big contract the following year for a guy who has had some injury concern...would be a tough sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...