Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Positions taken most often inside top 13 picks since 01


panther4life

Recommended Posts

QB's 24 or 2 per draft

DT'S 23 OR 1.91 per draft

WR 21 or 1.175 per draft

OT 20 or 1.66 per draft

DE 17 or 1.41 per draft

LB 15 or 1.25 per draft

CB 13 OR 1.08 per draft

RB 13 or 1.08 per draft

S 7 OR .583 per draft

TE 2 or .166 per draft

G 1 or 0.08 per draft

After looking at that i went and looked at how many players made the top 13 big board at each of these 3 sources, ESPN'S Scouts inc., NFL.COM'S prospect grades and NFL draft scout.

The following players all made their top 13 players.

in order of highest average ranking:

Joeckel(T)

Warmack(G)

Star(DT)

Demontre Moore(DE)

Barkevious Mingo(DE)

Jarvis Jones(LB)

so theres 6 player's I deem as near locks to be off the board by the time we pick with Warmack possibly falling since Guards rarely go that high. Normally 1 RB goes in the top 13 but not likely this year so I could see Warmack sneaking in place of a RB.

History also tells us their will likely be 2 QB's gone so that brings the total to 8 off the board. 2 DT's are usually gone by the 14th as well and it appears Richardson is the most likely to go behind Star inside the top 13. Add in Milliner as an average of 1 corner goes and that takes the total up to 11 off the board. 2 WR's seems to be the norm as well and that means Patterson and Allen could be gone too. Now thats a total off 13 players. I'll add Fisher the OT and Werner the DE as prospects who are likely to go based of their big board rankings and historical amount of times their respective positions go in the top 13.

So to recap according to history and the 3 big boards I referenced from above here are the players I think are most likely to be gone by our pick at 14.

1.Joeckel OT

2.Star DT

3.Warmack G

4.Moore DE

5Mingo DE

6.Geno Smith QB

7.Jarvis Jones LB

8.Richardson DT

9.Milliner CB

10.Patterson WR

11.Allen WR

12.Fisher OT

13.Werner DE

Of Course if any qb's or other positions like LB that we have no need at move inside the top 13 then odds of a player at a position of need will fall to us increases.

If the draft does fall this way i'd probably look to go with Hankins or Vaccaro.

edit: Jarvis Jones (LB) was also in the top 15 of every big board I referenced. I removed a 2nd qb from being drafted to adjust for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, it's not. It's one of the most important positions in the game and the only team that didnt know it were the Marty Hurney led Carolina panthers.

It is so blatant too. I have had a hard time these past four seasons watching teams gash us on the ground up the middle. We have not had capable DTs since Buckner and Jenkins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is a question.  Could Coby White be a solid replacement for Ball? Seems he could be an upgrade. Seems he played well in replacement of Ball.  I normally get the highlights and don't get to see any games but I liked when White was on on the court. 
    • Honestly, the guy does a TON of good research. His videos are always high quality and his insight is always stellar.  This video however changed my mind...dramatically about the draft.  Anyone who's seen my opinions knows Im a all in BPA guy, HOWEVER, this kind of changed my mind...Im now a BPA...at position of value dictated by the board.  A lot of words to say, weighted average is important. We all all know that having a good qb on a rookie contract is important, but what about a good edge...or reciever...or tackle?  THOSE things make a different and this opened my eyes to that.  With that said, not that I think we SHOULD go receiver in the first, HOWEVER, IT DOES MAKE SENSE.  If you have good young recievers coming in on rookie contracts, then you have more to build the rest of the roster at a lower cost.  If we were a team loaded at Receiver then things would be different, however, we only truly have 2 reliable WRs, so would another Receiver be a bad pick...I actually dont think so now based on value going forward.  Its just something to consider for everyone.    
    • Yeah, it's fool's gold. Darnold always had the tools. He just needed a tram with an elite D, a top 5 WR, and a Super Bowl MVP RB to carry him so he wouldn't be asked to press where he becomes a turnover machine. Darnold settled in once he was in a situation where he could just be a very talented game manager. People try to tell themselves Bryce can do that without realizing that Darnold still forces the D to respect the throws he can make that the coaches would rather he not attempt where as Bryce simply doesn't have the physical ability to force that respect opening up other opportunities. Like Parcells said leading up to the draft that based on his physical tool set "he better walk on water". What he was politely trying to say is that Bryce simply doesn't have an NFL physical tool set.
×
×
  • Create New...