Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question for the ladies


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

OK, I never considered myself to be that hairy, pretty average.

My ex-fiancee constantly complined out it, but I wrote it off. All she really cared about was getting her box-o-wine a night and cigarettes.

However, for the last year I have been wearing a St Christopher medal and fine chain. The chain grabs my chest hair amost every time I move!

I'm not the guy who goes without his shirt and looks liek he's wearing a Mohawk sweater!

But maybe it's time I knock the forest down, at least thin it out.

I understand that those epi things hurt like all get out as they pull the hair out! I really don't want to spend $1500 on laser treaments. A former GF of mine, tried Nair once and I turned beet red and hurt like someone set me on fire!

What are my options?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clippers do great trimming it up...I never found wax that painful and was always easier for me to just pay to have it done, but then again I am only hairy on the chest and mid stomach and I got red too but it'll go away.

Lasering is time consuming; you will be returning to treatment A LOT, plus the money.

My advice? Find a chick who that poo doesn't matter, in fact, find a chick nothing cosmetic matters to because as you age it goes down the shitter anyways. Chicks who dig cosmetic things like a lot of material things... and in the end there is nothing to these women except nice looks which will eventually go away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No man shall ever ask a question of women on a message board. Lo, he may think many exist, he shall remain blind until he renounces his post and surf facebook more often.

Ye may be smitten with a fair lass, but his internet brothers must always guide him back to the free flowing streams.

Book of Pstall Ch 4, verse 22-24

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Find a chick who that poo doesn't matter, in fact, find a chick nothing cosmetic matters to because as you age it goes down the shitter anyways. Chicks who dig cosmetic things like a lot of material things... and in the end there is nothing to these women except nice looks which will eventually go away.

what? I don't like hairy guys so that makes me materialistic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what? I don't like hairy guys so that makes me materialistic?

I think the intent of the post was good: Find a woman who accepts who you are, regardless of any slight imperfections you may have. Those who do not accept this, and get hung up about it to the point of nagging are not worth a person's time, because those women will end up being more bother than their worth. Same goes for guys too. If you care for someone, you accept them for who they are. If you don't, you try to change them. Simple fact.

This is moot anyways, since it doesn't answer the OP's question, or is really relevant in any way. Personally, the idea of trying to shave my chest is not something I'd ever contemplate doing. It grows back twice as thick once you start, and since Nair is obviously out, the alternative I'd consider is to maybe switch from a chain to a leather rope of some kind. That way, he could still wear the medal, without fear of it ripping out any hairs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've liked him since his rookie year as a prospect, but when he's been asked to play in a large capacity, he has simply not done well.   He does not really add anything, rather muddies up the room.  Fant is TERRIBLE as a blocker, a pure receiving TE.   Let's just put Tremble aside since he's PUP (although I still like him as a TE2, but yeah he's not our future starter)... Sanders has already shown better receiving skills than a Fant and has a nice ceiling.  Not to mention, he's got in-line run blocking skills.  I really want to see what he's capable of this year.  Also has a year+ experience now in Canales' offense, not to mention legit chemistry with Bryce. And after Sanders, I also imagine our staff is waiting to see how Mitchell Evans looks in camp as he's got the in-line blocking skills.  If he looks fully capable of filling in behind Sanders, then I don't see a need.  Overall, keep an eye out on early August moves.  They are usually soft indicators of how staff's view their rookie late rounders and roster overall.  This is a wait and see what the market presents and how they think their unit looks in camp.  
    • Every team has different needs of the backup QB.   On some teams a young hopeful makes sense and on others an old worn out dude makes sense.  We are a little more in the in-between IMO where you probably would prefer a Fields, Pickett, Howell type IMO.   So a young disappoint that you there is still some hail mary hope in.....given BY essentially was benched both seasons for performance (I know that's not the official line going into Seattle but I think most would agree he got a break and should of been benched later that year).  I know we want Bryce to be the week 17 guy all season this upcoming year.  But it's still in the reasonable thought process that the other dude could show back up. 
    • I wouldn't mind it if they bring him in cheap for competition. I would imagine he would vie for the 3rd TE spot with the rookie. 
×
×
  • Create New...