Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Alex Smith Traded To The Chiefs (How This Could Effect The Panthers Draft)


rscott94

Recommended Posts

What are the Chiefs seeing, that they should give up a second rounder for a dink and dunk passer?

one rookie QB with a bum shoulder and the other that doesnt look like he is ready to be a starter. Did you see the interview Geno did with Mooch? That would scare a lot of NFL execs away. Geno isnt going to be a great NFL QB. Bad pocket awareness and you get pressure on him and he cracks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are the Chiefs seeing, that they should give up a second rounder for a dink and dunk passer?

Maybe they're not confident in Geno Smith? Don't know why he looked pretty good at the combine, he's raw but his potential is higher than Alex Smith's (although I haven't watched that much game tape on him)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Chiefs could have been smarter about this. I can understand their desperation for a QB, but to give up a high draft pick for a guy like Alex Smith? That would be like trading away a late first round pick for a guy like Marc Bulger.

They could have drafted a QB in the third, and got the same kind of skills Alex Smith offers. Terrible move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Chiefs could have been smarter about this. I can understand their desperation for a QB, but to give up a high draft pick for a guy like Alex Smith? That would be like trading away a late first round pick for a guy like Marc Bulger.

They could have drafted a QB in the third, and got the same kind of skills Alex Smith offers. Terrible move.

I agree they should have picked up Matt Moore in FA and taken a 2nd or 3rd round qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not going to happen, but I'd STILL take Geno.

If I have been hearing Smith compared to Aaron Brooks, still do it. Smith may give you some short term success over Cassel, but I think Geno's ceiling is way higher than what Alex has shown.

I'd keep pulling the trigger on QB's until you find your guy. You reaaaaaally think KC is ready to invest the future into Alex Smith? 0_0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not going to happen, but I'd STILL take Geno.

If I have been hearing Smith compared to Aaron Brooks, still do it. Smith may give you some short term success over Cassel, but I think Geno's ceiling is way higher than what Alex has shown.

I'd keep pulling the trigger on QB's until you find your guy. You reaaaaaally think KC is ready to invest the future into Alex Smith? 0_0

Geno is just like Chris Weinke on the field great passer but cant handle the pressure. He will most likely be a big bust if he is thrown onto the field to early.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Geno is just like Chris Weinke on the field great passer but cant handle the pressure. He will most likely be a big bust if he is thrown onto the field to early.

Agreed. Give Smith his shot, but if I were the cheifs I'd feel so much better knowing there's young potential talent on the bench.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that would be essentially two first round picks (#34 is essentially a first rounder) QBs in a row...in the same draft. sorry....not gonna happen.

It probably won't happen, but it wouldn't surprise me if it did. Teams will give up pretty much anything to get a franchise QB and if they feel like Geno is that guy, there you go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It probably won't happen, but it wouldn't surprise me if it did. Teams will give up pretty much anything to get a franchise QB and if they feel like Geno is that guy, there you go.

it would surprise me.

if they felt that geno was their guy, they wouldn't have given up a second for another QB. you don't give up an early pick for a QB you intend to be a short term solution. you don't use two early draft picks in a row on QBs.

they didn't trade for smith so they could draft geno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...