Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Assuming we dont receive Portlands pick..


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

no, it would be stupid to ignore the PF/C position for the 4th year in a row

and im not so sure Maclemore is the best overall player/superstar- he seems passive in the tourney so far.. very passive- i want a killer with our #1 pick- esp if thats the #1 overall pick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I actually think all the top 5 or so prospects are good, but nobody stands out as number 1. Between Mclemore's disappearance in the tourney and Shabbazz becoming a year older, you could make a case for a few different players.

Hell if the draft were today, I wouldnt be opposed to drafting Len #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was on the McLemore bandwagon, but he seems to lack a killer instinct, and seems to disappear at times.

As much as I hate to say it, I guess I'm on the Noel bandwagon. He won't play most of next season, so we

will suck again and have a high pick in 2014, which is supposedly a better draft.

so tired of losing though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Henderson coming on strong, I'm all for resigning him and going Oladipo (a guy that I think can be top a 10 player at his position) and address power forwad and center in free agency.

I'll admit I wasn't a fan of Oladipo at first but after watching him these past two months, I can see that he has the IT factor.

I hope we don't get Portlands pick because this draft will be weak.

Idealy I say that it would be nice to trade down with Phoenix

Charlotte Receives

Pick #5 - Victor Oladipo

Pick #30- Gorgui Dieng

Future First

Phoenix Receives

Pick #1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'd been trying out different mobile browsers to see what worked best with the board (Brave used to be good but wasn't cutting it these days). My Choice: Firefox (Android) Unlike some others, Firefox embeds links on the first try. The method that works best is to make the change from "x" to "Twitter" in a separate editor (note taking apps tend to work) then paste it in as plain text. Doing this, I've yet to have an issue. Also worth noting that this browser doesn't give you the little "broken link" sign when you post an emoji like a lot of others do. Hope that helps 🙂 ... Of course if you can't spell or type for sh-t, you're lazy about editing and/or your grammar sucks, a browser isn't going to help that 😐
    • Sacks are a function of the scheme you run and the quality of your pass defense. Many sacks are coverage sacks because your secondary stopped the short pass and gave your rushers time to get to the quarterback. One gap schemes generate more sacks from your d- line while 2 gap schemes tend to concentrate sacks on linebackers and blitzers. So how successful any of our D line will be will depend on Evero's scheme. If we rush three again and no blitzes we won't be getting sacks.  If we use more press coverage and start 6 guys on the line and confuse the blocking assignments and use more blitzes, stunts and overloads Brown and company could feast. Guys will get more work as they learn the system and playing time as they produce on the field.
×
×
  • Create New...