Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Realistically who will be there at pick 44?


jarhead

Recommended Posts

I keep seeing guys mocked and see us bringing in people but quite frankly how may will be there at 44.? Will J hunter,Larry Warford ,D Hopkins,Eric Reid, Barrett Jones. David Amerson, Matt Elam. ,Robert Woods,Johnathan jenkins be there? Anyone else? Who is the BPA out of all of them?

We need to hit on the 44th pick but who will it be? Am i correct in saying we have had meetings with Elam and Hunter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is really hard to say.

Players will slide out of the first round, which will change the entire dynamic of the.second round.

and that is why i love the draft some teams will reach causing shifts in teams drafting arrangements which then results in frantic trading and swapping

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depends on who we draft in the 1st as to whom we may draft in the 2nd

Of course it does but i was hoping i could see who may be there and who could be an upgrade to our current roster because I believe we are counting on our 2nd pick to be a starter. Example I see an OG,NTand safety that would add immediate starters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep seeing guys mocked and see us bringing in people but quite frankly how may will be there at 44.? Will J hunter,Larry Warford ,D Hopkins,Eric Reid, Barrett Jones. David Amerson, Matt Elam. ,Robert Woods,Johnathan jenkins be there? Anyone else? Who is the BPA out of all of them?

We need to hit on the 44th pick but who will it be? Am i correct in saying we have had meetings with Elam and Hunter?

A lot of those could quite realistically be available at #44. I'm thinking Hunter, Hopkins and Warford are the most likely of that group to be gone. They also happen to be the 3 I'm most interested in at #44, assuming we go DT at #14.

I'm not sure about Elam, but I'm pretty sure we were just present at Hunter's pro day, checking him and Patterson out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A lot of those could quite realistically be available at #44. I'm thinking Hunter, Hopkins and Warford are the most likely of that group to be gone. They also happen to be the 3 I'm most interested in at #44, assuming we go DT at #14.

I'm not sure about Elam, but I'm pretty sure we were just present at Hunter's pro day, checking him and Patterson out.

Yea I think at least Hopkins will be gone....I am pretty sure we spoke to Elam. I am not sure how interested we will be in the second wave of receivers unless we want to supplant Lefell for some reason.I am inclined to think we would be looking at either a OG,OT,SS,NT,or CB with the second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So dumb I get it, they want to expand the reach of the NFL, but it's not the right sport to be playing games halfway around the world for a variety of reasons.   But one of the main ones is what happens if a player has an injury in that game? A lot of times, you're not supposed to fly right after some injuries, so when they happen here it's not a big deal, the player stays in that town for a few days and then flys home separately.  But that opens a whole bag of worms if the game is played all the way out in Australia. Plus just needing that long of a flight to get out there and back, even if they get a bye week after, it means a ton of travel and needing to adjust to a new time zone directly after another game.
    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
×
×
  • Create New...