Should we draft two WRs in the first two rounds?

[Ivan The Awesome]

no. that would be stupid.

now a WR and a TE in the first couple rounds?

GENIUS!!!!!!!

That would be more ideal but Olsen is more than enough. Unless we get a decent TE in our later rounds then sure.

[AceBoogie]

You know. I made a comment about this but it was all in good fun. If we take a WR in both the 1st and 2nd Adams, Pilares, and any WR we picked in the past 3 years would become a waste.

Their a waste now

[stirs]

Wouldn't it be fun to see Cam on the field with 89, Keenan and Hunter?

Yeah, they could help carry him off the field because the D will kill him.

Hey, we cornered the market on expensive RB's, now let's do the same with WR's.

Team sport guys and it starts in the trenches. If you are not good there, you are not good anywhere.

[Peppers90 NC]

man just because a thought passes through one's head, doesn't mean it needs to be shared.

[koolkatluke]

I'm just trying to put some life into this thread, but what if we change Sione Fua to Sione Pouha, Keenan/Hunter (1/2), and get a guy like Shamarko Thomas in the 4th? We have to agree that on paper, we have a already better defense than last year with an improved secondary. If we can add Pouha and Thomas, defense drastically improved. Maybe, we could go two receivers after all.

No!! Dude is a 2 down player on the down side of his career.

Not attacking you Chuck but why is the DT position so devalued by some people in this Fan Base? Does anybody not remember 2011 when Bargin shopping bandaid DT and 2 3rd round rookie lead us to the worst defense in the league.

[carolina-chuck]

No!! Dude is a 2 down player on the down side of his career.

Not attacking you Chuck but why is the DT position so devalued by some people in this Fan Base? Does anybody not remember 2011 when Bargin shopping bandaid DT and 2 3rd round rookie lead us to the worst defense in the league.

I don't think the DT position is devalued in this fan base. More like its devalued by the front office. Every year fans talked about taking a DT.

[carolina-chuck]

Yeah, they could help carry him off the field because the D will kill him.

Hey, we cornered the market on expensive RB's, now let's do the same with WR's.

Team sport guys and it starts in the trenches. If you are not good there, you are not good anywhere.

So you're thinking we're going with an Olineman in the 1st or 2nd?

[rayzor]

That would be more ideal but Olsen is more than enough. Unless we get a decent TE in our later rounds then sure.

TEs are merely giant WRs anymore. if we can add *insert your favorite WR this draft* and eifert, ertz, or escobar...can you imagine how hard that offense would be to stop? set for years. add NT in offseason and use the rest of the picks to take care of OL.

i know it won't and probably shouldn't happen, but i think everyone would be happy with that offense. pretty much would be unstoppable. considering we already have the best D in the NFCS, i think we would pretty much own that division.

/pipe dream

[koolkatluke]

I don't think the DT position is devalued in this fan base. More like its devalued by the front office. Every year fans talked about taking a DT.

Which could be a major reason why Hurney isn't here anymore. I hope Gettlemen has a better prospective on this position .

[Panthersguru14]

Wouldn't it be fun to see Cam on the field with 89, Keenan and Hunter?

I would pee on myself if this happened

[Ivan The Awesome]

Their a waste now

Not all of them. Plus we don't know what we have in Bryant. LaFell is decent. Ginn and Hixon are wildcards.

Take one, ok, taking two is desperate.

[CharlottePanther]

It wouldnt be shocking if it happened, I mean we have met with 10 WRs, wonder if thats because they want to take two of them

[Lumps]

NO. For two reasons.

1. First and foremost we have no #3 pick

2. We have more holes and have to be more efficient with these picks. Picking two WRs means our 4-7 has to be GOLD or we will not address any other position. I do not trust what we have starting at other positions to focus on WR.

If we trade down for a 3rd or extra 2nd, I say hell yes.

[stirs]

So you're thinking we're going with an Olineman in the 1st or 2nd?

If one of the 3 OT's were there in the first, absolutely. Wont be there, so DT might be the pick, especially if Philly passes on Star, he could fall. A great front 7 instantly makes your CB's and Safties about 2 notches ahead of where they were last year. Just saying. Anytime a QB gets all day to pass, there is not a secondary in the league that can stop a passing attack.