Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jramsey4's Mock


jramsey4

Recommended Posts

And the moment no ones been waiting for, my Mock Draft. This seems to be a so-so draft IMO no one prospect is miles ahead of the rest. The top 10 picks are anyone's guess and so is most of the draft. Obviously the number one option for pretty much every single armchair GM is to trade back. Unlikely in the first but a team might be willing to trade a early 3rd and 4th for our second. There is good value at need positions for those draft positions so that's just what I did.

Rd 1 Pick 14

Xavier Rhodes CB FSU

I have had my eye on Rhodes since he toyed with the idea of declaring last year. The guy is on his man like white on rice in press man coverage. Is IMO the best press man corner in the draft and its not close. Not as good in off man or zone but is experienced in those areas. He's a big 6'1" Corner that can be lined up 1 on 1 with the Julio Jones' of the NFCS and we are lacking in that area minus Gamble. He also uses that sizes well in run support.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhodes would be good value, second best corner at a position of need. I would like to see a receiver a bit sooner, Cam is going to need more weapons. Fauria would be great i think, we could do more 2 TE sets and add another red zone target, we should really keep an eye on one of these mid round TE's. Looks like you put a lot of thought into this, much better than many. Good mock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd kill someone if we traded a high 2nd rounder for a 3rd and 4th to be honest. The 4th round is essentially when it starts becoming a crap shoot/about depth and special teamers. Give me the potential starter we can get in the 2nd.

Because we have gotten so many starters in the 2nd. Not saying your wrong but I like my chances with 2 picks. Besides i really like Williams but I think he'll be there early 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhodes would be good value, second best corner at a position of need. I would like to see a receiver a bit sooner, Cam is going to need more weapons. Fauria would be great i think, we could do more 2 TE sets and add another red zone target, we should really keep an eye on one of these mid round TE's. Looks like you put a lot of thought into this, much better than many. Good mock.

I personally think Corner, DT, ROL are bigger needs then receiver. Fauria is going to be a beast especially in the red zone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rd 1 Pick 14

Xavier Rhodes CB FSU

.....He's a big 6'1" Corner that can be lined up 1 on 1 with the Julio Jones' of the NFCS and we are lacking in that area minus Gamble...

uh

I can't tell if you mean that we lack in CB "other than" Gamble or "because of the loss".

wording is messing me up maaaan.

as for the draft, I don't like the idea of trading our second. Not terrible though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The value on the trade is quite off. Even if we got the first picks in the 3rd and 4th round, we'd still be giving up 60+ points in that trade. It would take something like the 10th and 11th picks of the 3rd round to get our 2nd (not that anyone actually has both of those picks, but the point is valid).

If we are in the business of trading away our 2nd, I'd hope we get a 3rd and next year's 1th for our 2nd and 4th or something to that effect (something similar to the trade that landed us Everette Brown)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

uh

I can't tell if you mean that we lack in CB "other than" Gamble or "because of the loss".

wording is messing me up maaaan.

as for the draft, I don't like the idea of trading our second. Not terrible though.

Sorry doing all this on my Driod since my laptop went out. I was talking about the lack of a big body corner that we can line up 1 on 1 with the Jones' of the NFCS. Without Gamble its a bunch of small guys and cast offs. No one in our entire secondary would give a OC pause.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The value on the trade is quite off. Even if we got the first picks in the 3rd and 4th round, we'd still be giving up 60+ points in that trade. It would take something like the 10th and 11th picks of the 3rd round to get our 2nd (not that anyone actually has both of those picks, but the point is valid).

If we are in the business of trading away our 2nd, I'd hope we get a 3rd and next year's 1th for our 2nd and 4th or something to that effect (something similar to the trade that landed us Everette Brown)

Do you honestly think GMs consult a Value Chart before they make a trade? Especially considering it doesn't take into account value at postional needs in the rounds discussed. But honestly I didn't even look at the chart. Wouldn't mind a Brown type trade but theres no way we give up 2 picks in this draft that would leave us with only 3 picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Conspiracy theory:  They only spoke to one TE (based on the list I saw) and it was Joly.  They are telling us:  If we draft a TE, it will be day 3, and it will be Joly or we will stay with what we have.  
    • THE WALKER BACKGROUND Here is where this gets weird.  Walker is a serviceable LT who could benefit from Gilbert's experience and coaching.  However, he is known for below-average run blocking and frequent penalties.  As you know, a penalty from a LT is a drive killer. A former 7th round pick, Walker has outperformed expectations, but he still ranks around the middle of the pack when compared to other tackles.  Having said that, it seems as if the Panthers are banking on Walker for a year and will then make a decision on Ickey.  In Green Bay, Walker was the starter, but the Packers weren't exactly sold on him. While most people think the oft-injured David Bakhtiari retired in 2023, he really wanted to keep playing.  He was released on March, 11, 2024.  Walker stepped in and took the reserve LT job from Nijman in that 2023 season, but they were close--probably because Nijman was more of a swing OT.  However, Nijman was a free agent in 2024, so the Panthers signed him just a week after Bakhtiari was released, leaving the Packers only Walker to play LT.  A month later, the Packers drafted a LT in the first round, Jordan Morgan out of Arizona.  Most Packer fans believe that Morgan would have beat out Walker for the LT job in 2024, but he had some shoulder injuries and went to IR after 6 games. In 2025, when the Packers had an injury at G during the season, instead of putting Morgan in at LT for Walker as planned, they played Morgan to guard because Walker can only play 1 position.  The Packers currently project Morgan back to LT for 2026, which is probably why they did not seek to retain Walker, at least in part. Based on this history, it is safe to say this: Walker is better than Nijman. We have the benefit of them being on the same team in a direct competition to help us see that. Walker is probably closer to Ickey, except for the penalties.  That bothers me a lot.  Bryce sucks when we get behind the sticks, and a run-first offense with a poor run-blocking LT is not ideal.   Regardless, I think Ickey and the Panthers find themselves in limbo right now, so the Walker deal comes at a perfect time for the GM.  Gilbert, perhaps, can work on the penalties and maybe a TE like Tremble can help offset the run blocking issues, so maybe we can actually stay the course at OT.  Maybe we do not draft a LT--maybe we draft a RT to groom behind Moton.  Maybe we draft a C.  At LT, the Panthers do not want to overreact, especially if Ickey returns to form or Walker demonstrates improvement.  Depth is certainly a concern, but a solid RT can be that depth.   I doubt the Panthers draft a LT in rounds one or maybe two.  It seems we have bigger needs at Will LB, DT, TE, and maybe S.  
    • THIS! IF we go offense at 19, it should be the trenches, which is no longer a pressing need with Waler's signing. 3 biggest needs in 2026, IMO, are DT, FS, ILB. We need to upgrade our starters at those positions and I expect anyone rafted at 19 to start immediately. I could rationalize OT (right or left) or CB since we're an injury away from a severe drop off AND have huge offseason concerns at both next year. Unless Bryce plays a lot better, I want to upgrade QB next year so I could get behind locking in a 2027 starter this year if the right guy is there. You COULD argue NCB and TE are positions where we need to upgrade our starters, sure, but not at 19. Both positions can still be upgraded on day 2.
×
×
  • Create New...