Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if we traded our 1st for....


Recommended Posts

And next year you'll ask "what if we trade the pick we got from last year for next year's..." Some people don't have the balls to handle having a first round pick without wanting to trade out of it, and I'm glad our GM isn't one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every one is cool with trading down and getting a lower first round and a third. Take their second and third this year if you want an additional pick along with 2014 #1 pick.

I am not normally for trading our 1st away but this draft IMO is weak.

I don't think we will because we have so few picks this year anyhow. That said, I wouldn't be pissed if we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since i'm still not allowed to post and this is something that needs posting, the Vikings are looking to trade up for Tavon. They have a #23 and #25. I want this to happen more than anything. We could take Xavier Rhodes and not reach for a safety. Grab BPA DT/WR in 2nd. i hope to god this happens.

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-on-football/22105655/report-vikings-could-trade-up-to-select-receiver-in-round-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not an option I'd consider unless we are getting a better deal than that. The least I'd want is a 2nd and a 3rd in 2013, and perhaps a mid round pick in 2014. But I'd rather us either draft a guy with our first this year, or trade down and have a late first round pick. I agree with Rodeo, you've got to have the balls to make a pick in the first, and trading out shouldn't be under consideration unless we're landing a proven pro bowl type player in exchange (though our cap would probably prevent us trading it for a player).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not an option I'd consider unless we are getting a better deal than that. The least I'd want is a 2nd and a 3rd in 2013, and perhaps a mid round pick in 2014. But I'd rather us either draft a guy with our first this year, or trade down and have a late first round pick. I agree with Rodeo, you've got to have the balls to make a pick in the first, and trading out shouldn't be under consideration unless we're landing a proven pro bowl type player in exchange (though our cap would probably prevent us trading it for a player).

You wouldn't want the #23 and #25 pick? I say if they throw in their third this year then yeah def.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since i'm still not allowed to post and this is something that needs posting, the Vikings are looking to trade up for Tavon. They have a #23 and #25. I want this to happen more than anything. We could take Xavier Rhodes and not reach for a safety. Grab BPA DT/WR in 2nd. i hope to god this happens.

http://www.cbssports...iver-in-round-1

This would be a dream scenario if this actually happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We do, that's why i'm hoping this happens. We could really help shore up our secondary or just holes on defense if this happens.

I think we'd be better served by taking the BPA with our 1st, 2nd, 3rd and so forth. I fail to see the benefit of trading away the 14th pick for an additional 2nd.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
    • This is the flaw in your logic.  Cutting 3 of our best players will somehow move us from whatever we are to "compete". Even the most Young super fans are not predicting a ceiling above top 10-12, and that will not nearly cut it.  Someone will need to break the log jam of QBs getting nothing or North of 50. Our qb is at best a middle ground, lets hope it will be us that also manage to pay the worth at about 100 over 3 years.  And before you jump me, yes that is only of he improves.
×
×
  • Create New...