Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: 49ers looking to trade up to 13 or 14...


firstdayfan

Recommended Posts

Point blank, if Star or Lane falls to 14th, the last team I want to get stronger is the defending NFC champ. Why don't we do follow what the 49ers have done for years and stay put and draft on a BPA philosophy?

If Star fell I wouldn't want to trade even if they were offering their first four picks in this draft and next year's second. Assuming that doesn't happen, I don't give a poo if the reigning NFC champ gets better or not as long as we're getting better. And I think we'd progress more with the 31 and 34 picks than we would with the 14.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do the trade. Draft BPA this year and save the fireworks for next year. Trade up in the 1st (to top 5?) and get Marqise Lee from USC. If we want a WR, let's do it right and not rush to get one where any of the top 3 this year are interchangeable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Point blank, if Star or Lane falls to 14th, the last team I want to get stronger is the defending NFC champ. Why don't we do follow what the 49ers have done for years and stay put and draft on a BPA philosophy?

Point blank, neither of those players are falling to 14....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do the trade. Draft BPA this year and save the fireworks for next year. Trade up in the 1st (to top 5?) and get Marqise Lee from USC. If we want a WR, let's do it right and not rush to get one where any of the top 3 this year are interchangeable.

Que Promethean Forerunner to tell you why Marqise Lee isn't worth a 1st round pick let alone a top five pick....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, because Ngata and Revis didn't. Oh wait...

Save it for draft night, Nostradamus.

Yes because the Draft those two guys were in only had five prospects that Scouts are calling exceptional.... This draft sucks at the top, but the depth of it is insane....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It doesn't matter. Time and time again, an organization in the top ten makes an unexpected move or pick and as a result a prospect predicted to go 6th or 9th overall falls to the mid-round and whole dynamic shifts. The Chiefs traded for Alex Smith... anything goes.

How does it not matter that you have about half the number of "can't miss prospects" that you do most years? That's absolutely ridiculous to say. Of course it matters when you have a lower number of desirable prospects. That is unless you think five or more teams are going to make questionable moves. Also how does trading a second round pick for Alex Smith when they weren't going to take a QB #1 overall shift the dynamic? The worst kept secret of the whole draft was that the Chiefs were taking an OT number one overall whether it was Luke Joeckel or Eric Fisher. Sorry you can keep living in fantasy land but Star and Lane Johnson aren't falling.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that if Jarvis Jones is still on the board at 14, we'll be getting lots of calls.

It's almost like people forgot about him after the combine/medical issues. Lots of teams in the 20-30 range would love to have him, and he's probably not getting past Pittsburgh at 17.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a feeling that if Jarvis Jones is still on the board at 14, we'll be getting lots of calls.

It's almost like people forgot about him after the combine/medical issues. Lots of teams in the 20-30 range would love to have him, and he's probably not getting past Pittsburgh at 17.

I think the Saints would take a long look at him too. They will need an edge rusher for their 3-4....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree. At that endeavor we'd marching into second round territory. I rather take the 14th pick and see which top prospect falls (Eric Fisher, Star Lotulelei, Lane Johnson, Dee Millner, etc) out of the top ten.

If any of those players falls to our pick, I'd be happy for Gettleman to just make the pick instead of trading back. If none of those players fall to our pick (which is the most likely scenario) I think having #31 and #34 will benefit us more than taking Richardson, Austin, Vaccaro, or any of the usual suspects at #14. By a lot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...