Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Carolina Panthers Madden 10 Ratings


Car123

Recommended Posts

they will continue to show up if mods continue to put them in the forum were post go to die. i mean, its not like its madden in general, its madden about the panthers.

how is an article about panther player's rankings any different then a madden article about panther player's RATINGS?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two Madden threads were moved to the proper forum yesterday and snap, two more show up today. And the reason given is that Madden threads sent there die. HUH? If you guys want to discuss Madden, why don't you go there and discuss? Why should the rest of us who care nothing about it be subjected to them because you're too lazy to switch forums? Probably because complaints about them are what keep them alive. It's just ridiculous if you ask me...

I know it's offseason and the board is a little more liberal. But I'll read 100 "pick up Vick" threads if I don't have to read fantasy threads, that's just how it is...

Nothing against you, it's just so ridiculous...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They lowered the ratings of each player other than superstars across the board, so ratings will be lower than expected.

However, Gamble got screwed. Beason should be higher. Kemo is better than D Lewis. Otah's pass block is better than run block? Really? How is the run block not higher for our line as a whole?

And what the hell does DeAngelo have to do to get his carrying rating to 99? ZERO FUMBLES.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Gamble is strangely rated, he's low at 83 overall but his speed is through the roof at 93.

Gamble is not as fast as Marshall.

Wharton is underrated.

Hoover is WAAAAY underrated.

Jake Delhomme with 84 throw power is basically a girl in shoulder pads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...