Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charles Davis reaffirms he is the biggest idiot in sports media


JawnyBlaze

Recommended Posts

Billick -" all top receivers in the league were drafted in the first round"

Case and point, Steve Smith? 3rd round.

And for the record, the top 5 receivers that lead the league in yards in 2012:

#1 - Calvin Johnson (1st round)

#2 - Andrew Johnson (1st round)

#3 - Brandon Marshall (4th round)

#4 - Demariyus Thomas (1st round)

#5 - Vincent Jackson (2nd round)

He might have a point that it's easier to find a great receiver in the 1st round, but there's just as many great receivers that weren't drafted in the 1st.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Billick -" all top receivers in the league were drafted in the first round"

Case and point, Steve Smith? 3rd round.

And for the record, the top 5 receivers that lead the league in yards in 2012:

#1 - Calvin Johnson (1st round)

#2 - Andrew Johnson (1st round)

#3 - Brandon Marshall (4th round)

#4 - Demariyus Thomas (1st round)

#5 - Vincent Jackson (2nd round)

He might have a point that it's easier to find a great receiver in the 1st round, but there's just as many great receivers that weren't drafted in the 1st.

Oh yea, forgot about that bit. That was what originally made me think Billick was a bit off in that segment. The "all the best WRs come from the 1st, so if you need a WR you have to take one in the 1st". That's pretty crazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heh, we'll just agree to disagree then :)

I agree Star is versatile enough to play any DT position (including 3-4 DE), but I think he's best as a 4-3 DT. Not pigeon-holed into UT/NT, not every 4-3 team operates that way. He's just a big nasty DT that collapses pockets and holds the point of attack.

I think Sheldon fits 3-4 DE better BECAUSE he's undersized. 3-4 DEs are usually DTs that are a little taller, longer arms, and leaner than your average 4-3 DT. Ngata isn't the standard for 3-4 DEs, he's just the best because he's so athletic for his size. Guys like Seymour, Watt and Justin Smith are all taller, longer, leaner guys that are under 300 lbs and are the mold for 3-4 DEs. They could all function in a 4-3 as an UT I'm sure, but are better as 3-4 DEs, just like Richardson. Just my opinion though :)

I can see what you are saying. However, Missouri was a 4-3 team last year with very few if any 3-4 looks. It will be harder for a 4-3 DT to absorb into a 3-4 system as his only chance to play would be at DE, like you said. He will have to rely on his own instincts (which he will have very few of in that position) and won't have someone directly next to him to take up blocks. In fact, as a 3-4 DE, he'll have to take up blocks and place more emphasis on run stopping so the LB behind can get in the backfield, which is vastly different to what he was doing in college as a pass rushing UT.

I don't know....seems like a square peg-round hole situation for him in NY. I don't see Ryan making it work unless he wants more 4-3 looks in his D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yea, forgot about that bit. That was what originally made me think Billick was a bit off in that segment. The "all the best WRs come from the 1st, so if you need a WR you have to take one in the 1st". That's pretty crazy.

That is why teams like Pittsburgh and New York win titles. They start from the inside out and control the line of scrimmage. The one dude said that panties were in a wad and other dumb ish. I do get agitated when I see moronic fans clamor for a WR when Cam damn near passed for 8,000yds his first two seasons. Meanwhile, we can't hold a lead because teams can run, pass, and pretty much do whatever the hell they want to our defense. Personally, I don't want to be the Lions of the south. They drafted first round WRs for years and one is still on the roster as they miss the playoffs again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Carolina was going to pick Richardson but i think it was probably because they did not fathom that Star would even be there. Richardson would have to play the same position that Dwan plays, so it did not make much sense to me unless they were getting him for a rotation and eventual replacement. I just don't believe they were disappointed and let out expletives because they nearly raced to the podium with the Star pick.

We do need a receiver but at our pick last night, there was no BPA receiver available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Completely ignores that we took Stat over a more gifted version of Richardson lol.

Suck it up sports media. We didn't want Richardson. The middle of the road prospect went to your beloved Jets. The lowly Panthers ended up with a high profile top end pick. Put on your big boy panties and get over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Billick -" all top receivers in the league were drafted in the first round"

Case and point, Steve Smith? 3rd round.

And for the record, the top 5 receivers that lead the league in yards in 2012:

#1 - Calvin Johnson (1st round)

#2 - Andrew Johnson (1st round)

#3 - Brandon Marshall (4th round)

#4 - Demariyus Thomas (1st round)

#5 - Vincent Jackson (2nd round)

He might have a point that it's easier to find a great receiver in the 1st round, but there's just as many great receivers that weren't drafted in the 1st.

Yea that made me cringe... there are a TON of quality receivers that were not takin in the 1st.

Welker, Colston, Cobb, Desean Jackson, Mike Williams, Mike Wallace, Antonio Brown, Victor Cruz, Jordy Nelson, Marshall, V Jackson, Greg Jennings, TY Hilton, Steve Smith, Pierre Garcon, Anquan Boldin, Torrey Smith... theres more but they aren't on the top of my head.

If we had a guy opposite smith that could play like any of the above listed guys we would not be having this discussion about a need at receiver. Look I understand that if there is a Calvin Johnson, an AJ Green or even a Julio Jones (who with all the talent in the world still can't out produce his significantly physically inferior counterpart Roddy White) you do your best to get them. You know they are going to be a slam dunk and will own the league for a decade. That guy was not in this draft - and from the looks of things we aren't the only team to think that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has an obvious point about the WR situation, but at 14 I think Tavon was the only reasonable pick. 2nd round could be where we take another shot at a WR, I really hope Allen is there.

Me too man. Allen and Hunter. I wonder is Da'Rick will be there in the 4th
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...