Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Should we try to get into the third, and, if so, how do we do it?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Not saying that I think that we should or would do it, but being that this year has some players that have the possibility to possibly to start for us in the 3rd at WR, Safety and/or CB, should we be thinking of a way to get back into the third at this point?

I don't know which way we're going to go with this second pick, but I have a suspicion that guys like Ryan Swope, Kenny Stills, Bacarri Rambo, Shamarko Thomas, Tyrann Mathieu, David Amerson and Sanders Commings---just to name a few----will be there, ripe for the picking in the 3rd. Being that you have what appears to be great upside to some of these players this year, is it worth say giving up next year's 2nd to get up into the 3rd this year (or some other price, tbd)?

I doubt it happens, but I was just thinking about it. What do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubtful. We'd have to give up too much. DeAngelo + a 5th or something like it. This draft is deep enough at our positions of need that we can survive without a 3rd, luckily.

I actually wouldn't be surprised if we take Ryan Swope in the 2nd, though, since you mentioned him. He's going to go earlier than a lot of mocks have had him going, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doubtful. We'd have to give up too much. DeAngelo + a 5th or something like it. This draft is deep enough at our positions of need that we can survive without a 3rd, luckily.

I actually wouldn't be surprised if we take Ryan Swope in the 2nd, though, since you mentioned him. He's going to go earlier than a lot of mocks have had him going, IMO.

The Evil Empire just got 4 more picks (in this draft, I believe). I think one of those picks is going to be Swope, so if we want him, we'd have to go get him. Problem is, I don't think we even worked him out, so no way I think that we pick him. TBH, I don't see him going before the third, and some of it may be due to stereotypical notions (though I can justify Hunter, Allen, Woods, Dobson and maybe a couple of others going before him).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do we keep having to explain to each other why Gettlemen won't do this? Get it together people!

That's easy to say, but you would have to look at the perceived value this year against perceived value next year, so it's not like it's an outlandish thought. That being said (like I already said), I doubt that we do it, especially with G-man at the helm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's easy to say, but you would have to look at the perceived value this year against perceived value next year, so it's not like it's an outlandish thought. That being said (like I already said), I doubt that we do it, especially with G-man at the helm.

What? So let's say you are an incoming GM who is already having to clean up not only a roster but a salary cap disaster right off the bat. You also only have 5 picks thanks to the previous GM. So your first draft in you are going to mortgage the future and get trade happy? I just do not see it. Atleast not from a professional like our guy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What? So let's say you are an incoming GM who is already having to clean up not only a roster but a salary cap disaster right off the bat. You also only have 5 picks thanks to the previous GM. So your first draft in you are going to mortgage the future and get trade happy? I just do not see it. Atleast not from a professional like our guy.

I'm not a GM, but I'd think you have to keep your options open. The salary cap is a non-issue in regards to the draft---if anything it helps you out with the salary cap. In any event, it's all about perceived value and needs, and your overall perception of the state of your team. If you feel you're close to getting where you need to be in the immediate, then you may be more willing to pull the trigger. But, like I said, I don't think we do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So picking up a 3rd would require either trading back from our current position in the second, trading away next years draft picks, or trading a current player on the roster.

1. Trading back in the second is an interesting option. The middle of the second is usually considered a bubble period where the draft is starting to run low on starting caliber players. With the depth in this years draft, this could be a possibility.

2. Trading future picks (2013), bundling our 4th, 5th, or 6th. We don't have much to work with here, but I suppose if there is a player we really want in the 3rd Starter > camp fodder

3. I hope the idea of trading away next years draft picks is out of the question. One thing I have learned, when the Panthers trade away future picks, it NEVER works out in our favor. some of our best moves were made when trading back (Beason + Kalil), not up (Armanti Edwards, Everette Brown, etc)

4. Trading a current player on the roster? I don't know who we have to trade. Our RB's? I believe that would hurt us financially. Jimmy Clausen? If only Mel Kiper was a GM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty sure the days of the Panthers War Room being a trading post are over.

Gettleman doesn't seem to be inclined to trade up or down.

It's especially unlikely in a draft where you have fewer picks, and I doubt giing away future picks is an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...