Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Winston wants 3-4 million..


Recommended Posts

Wouldn't mind at all, cut dwill and give Winston a 3 year 9 Million dollar deal with some incentives that could boost it up to 12. 

 

I would be all for that, then we could focus on drafting a replacement for Gross next year or the year after and not have to worry about RT for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, guys, Eric Winston is a fantastic player, but he really only fits into a zone blocking scheme. Thus why he was so dominate in Houston and so-so in Kansas City (although, that could be attributed more to the fact that KC wasn't very good last year.)

 

Do I think he's an upgrade to Bell? Yes, absolutely I do. But, for the money we're paying Bell, I don't think there's really that large of a gap between Bell and Winston. Now, if we were installing a ZBS, then hell yes, he'd be an immediate upgrade. As it stands now, though, with the offense we plan to run, I don't think that Winston is worth the extra load of cash.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that too much for a 29 year old RT? He's not getting too many calls. I wonder if Gettleman would call him and offer him a one year deal?

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/04/09/eric-winston-wants-3-4-million-calls-free-agent-market-frustrating/

To me we need a RT but whether they want a starter or depth is more the question.I cannot see them not signing one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going from the 32nd to 27th ranked QB is a huge achievement indeed.
    • I do expect the offense to fall back to earth next year if everything stays the same.  It is kinda like how the Panthers and even now the Chiefs won in the past.  Winning many close, coin flip games.  It never lasts from season to season usually. 
    • Biased is one way of putting it. The NFL is an entertainment product in the strictest legal sense. Although I might yell it out on game days, I do not believe the games are outright “rigged” meaning there is one team that is going to win no matter what happens. It’s impossible. There’s too much variance in the game that can prevent a truly rigged game from happening unless there was cooperation from many parties involved. What I am thoroughly convinced happens is that the NFL and referees “manage” the games towards certain outcomes. And that is done primarily through referee crew choice however I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more going on behind the curtain.  The NFL uses the officials statistical tendencies to call penalties is to keep games close to drive user engagement. For example, If a crew tends to call more false start penalties, and there’s a game between a heavy pass offense where the NFL would like to manufacture a close game where it might have potential to be a blowout, then they’ll assign a crew that will slow that offense down and keep the game close.  There is an insane amount of marketing and now sports betting money that is married to the NFL economic ecosystem. To think this whole system is fair when the referee union has no outward accountability structure for poor performance is just naive. It’s closer to the WWE than outward appearances suggest, but it’s not a fully scripted outcome either. So for those who say “stop watching” if you don’t want to watch a “rigged” game, it’s an entertainment product. You can still be entertained by it, even if it’s not as fair as a truly merit based sporting event. 
×
×
  • Create New...