Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The MMQB - Derek Mason (Stanford Dir Def) whiteboards option defense


dos poptarts

Recommended Posts

http://mmqb.si.com/2013/07/26/derek-mason-stanford-read-option/?sct=hp_t11_a1&eref=sihp

 

Found the video and article to be very good & informative. More football and less fluff.

There's been similar discussions on the Huddle, but this interview is from the Derek Mason who found a way to slow down the Oregon Offense. One of his key points is to slow down the read part of the QB.

 

Not sure I agree w/ the 3-4 vs 4-3. Seems gap assignment is more important that how you line up.

 

I guess the Peter King butt hurt is infectious, because there's no reference to Cam/Panthers, only to RGIII, Kap, Russel. Article is written by Greg Bedard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the Peter King butt hurt is infectious, because there's no reference to Cam/Panthers, only to RGIII, Kap, Russel. Article is written by Greg Bedard.

 

maybe because compared to the redskins, 49ers, and seahawks the panthers sucked at it.

 

it was definitely executed at a much more indecisive and undisciplined pace than those other teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://mmqb.si.com/2013/07/26/derek-mason-stanford-read-option/?sct=hp_t11_a1&eref=sihp

 

Found the video and article to be very good & informative. More football and less fluff.

There's been similar discussions on the Huddle, but this interview is from the Derek Mason who found a way to slow down the Oregon Offense. One of his key points is to slow down the read part of the QB.

 

Not sure I agree w/ the 3-4 vs 4-3. Seems gap assignment is more important that how you line up.

 

I guess the Peter King butt hurt is infectious, because there's no reference to Cam/Panthers, only to RGIII, Kap, Russel. Article is written by Greg Bedard.

Those teams took it to the playoffs and one to the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's going to be real interesting when we play the niners and seahawks and how they defend us and if we can defend them.  if this is true, a 3-4 able to fill more gaps efficiently than our standard 4-3 or will we be able to disguise our fronts and remain discipline enough at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I have said for a while

 

—but what makes the read-option so groundbreaking is that it’s being orchestrated by quarterbacks who can throw as well as they run. Pure option quarterbacks have never thrived in the NFL, but when Kaepernick throws the deep ball with accuracy, the 49ers are virtually unstoppable. As a defensive coordinator you need to pick your battles.

 

 

 

If you have a QB that can throw, and throw deep with accuracy you can't really defend the read option.

 

Unless of course you have defenders beating their blocks and double teams (which is what happened to us too much last season)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Watching Cam screw up the read-option last season was heartbreaking. I couldn't believe it. I refuse to believe that he will have the same trouble with it this season, so we need to go for take-2.

 

We have the kind of o-line that is going to win a few, and lose a few as far as the read-option is concerned. It's well worth a few stuffs to suddenly have Cam or Williams streaking down the field for a huge gain or TD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose it depends on what you mean as 'elite'. I typically mean someone that can play with lower level pieces around them and still win. There are very few of those. 
    • It would obviously be incredible if Brooks came back and just ran away with the job on his opportunities like Rico Dowdle did last year. But any Panthers fan that has been around the block knows better than to go ahead and make plans for that. Brooks has missed a ton of not just playing time but meaningful early career growth in a league that has increasingly devalued the position from an investment standpoint beyond one or two superstars. There's really not any comparison to look back on that lines up with the current iteration of the league at least not favorably. The key thing that this RB room has going for them is our investment in the OL. The highest paid OL in the league two years in a row paired with our staff should make it easier for just about any RB to get into open running lanes. But that is also anything but a given considering our OL was largely middle of the pack last year. In the end it might all be a moot point anyways if we again struggle to establish a viable passing attack.
    • I don't have him making the team and I think same goes for the staff, but they are hopeful for a PS spot.    I mean of course I'd like 3 all-world at RB and every spot, just doesn't work that why. Panthers normally carry 3. dan always talk up Etienne, even called him a future star.....I think Brooks will be fine as a 2 with health pls.....  Chubba can carry a seasons load as lead dawg.    Its fine, I mean backup OGs or CB is much higher on my worry scale(Id even put QB room as worse than RB room too...)
×
×
  • Create New...