Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The problem was Chudzinski

pantherfan81

By pantherfan81,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

pantherfan81 Newbie

pantherfan81

Posted
Posted

 

Welp. Steve Smith said on conference call that Rob Chudzinski was auditioning for a HC gig last year. Got away from optimal style.

 

 

 

https://twitter.com/SI_DougFarrar/status/375325626179149826

 

Smitty spitting daggers!

 

 

SEATTLE — By any measure, the 2012 Carolina Panthers’ offense was a disappointment in 2012. What was expected to be a potent run/pass combination became a relative debacle in which far too much was placed on Cam Newton’s shoulders following his record-breaking rookie season of 2011. The offensive balance was lost, and it took half a season for the Panthers to set things right. Carolina moved from dead last in the NFL in Football Outsiders’ opponent-adjusted offensive efficiency metrics in 2010, to fourth in ’11, and down to 10th in ’12. Carolina’s response to a 7-9 season was to fire general mamager Marty Hurney, nearly fire head coach Ron Rivera and replace offensive coordinator Rob Chudzinski (now the Cleveland Browns’ head coach) with former quarterbacks coach Mike Shula.

Panthers receiver Steve Smith conducted a conference call on Wednesday morning with the Seattle media in preparation for the Panthers’ Sunday opener with the Seattle Seahawks. When I asked Smith how things might be different under Shula, he went in a different direction than I expected — throwing Chudzinski under the bus.

“I think it was really a power move by the former offensive coordinator [Chudzinski] – he was really positioning himself and trying to show, ‘Hey I’m capable,’” Smith said. “I think he was applying for a head coaching job, and our offense kind of suffered because of that. At times, we got kind of cute and did things that weren’t necessarily us. Underutilizing Mike Tolbert — all kinds of different things. We’re out of that, the past is in the past, and we’re moving forward. Coach Shula’s going to change things up, and that’s what’s happened so far.”

The relative underuse of Tolbert was one of the more curious things about the Panthers’ offense. Carolina signed the former San Diego Chargers’ red-zone star — the perfect kind of bruising, bullish back for the Panthers’ smash-mouth running style — to a four-year, $8.4 million contract in March 2012, and inexplicably let his workload diminish. Tolbert still scored seven rushing touchdowns, but he carried the ball just 23 times in the red zone in 2012, as opposed to 59 carries in ’11, and 69 carries in ’10, when he set a career high with 11 rushing scores. It was the best of many examples of how Chudzinski had gone out of sync with his own personnel — for whatever reason.

So, are things different with Shula?

“I can’t really say how much, but it’s different. Just the little important things — over-verbiage and some other things [from last year] that seem small, but we’re focusing more on the details. That part is very, very important, and I think it’s the difference.”

 

 

 

http://nfl.si.com/2013/09/04/steve-smith-rob-chudzinski-carolina-panthers/

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

SteveReedAP 3:25pm via TweetDeck

Steve Smith on Rob Chudzinski: “I think it was really a power move of the prior offensive coordinator to position himself to really show...

...that ‘hey, I’m capable’ and I really believe it was applying for that head coaching job and I think our offense kind of suffered a...

...a little bit because of that. At times we got cute and did things that necessarily wasn’t us. And the un-utilizing of Mike Tolbert...

...Just a lot of different things. So we’re out of that, the past is in the past, we’re moving forward."

 

SteveReedAP 3:27pm via TweetDeck

That was Steve Smith on a conference call with Seattle reporters.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

We should have had a coach over Chud that could either have approved or denied his gameplan and kept him in check!

We could have called him a Chief Coach. Or maybe a Lead Coach. I don't know, I'll think of a better name.,

offense may still need someone like that.

 

i thought towards the end of last year that we should have a coach in charge of managing the game instead of rivera. let rivera do the monday - saturday and someone that knows what he's doing run the game. still don't think it would be a bad idea.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Zod Grand Master

Zod

Posted
Posted

offense may still need someone like that.

 

i thought towards the end of last year that we should have a coach in charge of managing the game instead of rivera. let rivera do the monday - saturday and someone that knows what he's doing run the game. still don't think it would be a bad idea.

 

 

That would be an assistant head coach who manages the week.

 

If your head coach isn't up to the task on gamedays.... well...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted

this part was interesting...

And the un-utilizing of Mike Tolbert...

 

as the season started i remember players talking up tolbert and how excited they were about how he was going to be used and then....nada.

 

i wonder if the role that had been planned for tolbert last year that wasn't utilized will be actually brought in this year. it would be nice to take advantage of everything that he brings. same with barner once he gets his toenail grown back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

Well most of us knew this about 4 weeks in last season, but it is nice to hear a player like Smitty speak out candidly about it.

What is sad is how long it took Rivera to implement a change.

This. As much as we want to trash Chud, it was Rivera who was ultimately in charge.

Let's just hope he has learned from last year. It's all we've got.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Chief Keek
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By Chief Keek · Posted

      The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • TD alt
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By TD alt · Posted

      That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • Chief Keek
      Emanuel McNeil Warren + Jacob Rodriguez

      By Chief Keek · Posted

      I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...