Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4th and inches


Toolbox

Recommended Posts

Remind me.  Who won that game?

 

 

 

And again... :rolleyes:

 

 

 

If I recall correctly the colts won that game and when asked wny he went for it in his own territory, he said that it gave his team the best chance to win. He didn't want to give the ball back to Manning. Same thing happened with Mike Smith in the Saints game a couple years ago.

 

Here are 2 examples of coaches and teams who were willing to think outside of the box and do something unconventional because they felt it gave them the best chance to win.

 

 

Put the ball in the hands of your best player and let him win the game for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if we all can't be so intelligent like you douche.

 

 

Honestly bro, Scot is probably one of the 3 most respected posters on the Huddle, should probably try and learn from what he says instead of acting like a fool trying to pretend you know more then him.

 

life lesson you need to learn is to know it's ok to admit when you are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry if we all can't be so intelligent like you douche.

 

 

 

come-fight-me-pussy-argghh_o_961739.jpg

 

 

Scot, I think Toolbox is some kid that just discovered Football and thinks he knows it all, it's the only thing I can figure for him.

 

Or he's thinking as the saying goes: if you ever dig a hole too deep sometimes its better to just keep digging then to admit the mistake.

 

Don't know, but it's reminded me of the Facebook fail pic above.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall correctly the colts won that game and when asked wny he went for it in his own territory, he said that it gave his team the best chance to win. He didn't want to give the ball back to Manning. Same thing happened with Mike Smith in the Saints game a couple years ago.

 

Here are 2 examples of coaches and teams who were willing to think outside of the box and do something unconventional because they felt it gave them the best chance to win.

 

Put the ball in the hands of your best player and let him win the game for you

 

And both failed.

 

You might want to find some better examples to suit your argument.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Scot, I think Toolbox is some kid that just discovered Football and thinks he knows it all, it's the only thing I can figure for him.

 

Or he's thinking as the saying goes: if you ever dig a hole too deep sometimes its better to just keep digging then to admit the mistake.

 

Thanks for thinking so highly of me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall correctly the colts won that game and when asked wny he went for it in his own territory, he said that it gave his team the best chance to win. He didn't want to give the ball back to Manning. Same thing happened with Mike Smith in the Saints game a couple years ago.

 

Here are 2 examples of coaches and teams who were willing to think outside of the box and do something unconventional because they felt it gave them the best chance to win.

 

 

Put the ball in the hands of your best player and let him win the game for you

 

they were both afraid to give the ball to the other team because they didnt think they could stop them, our defense practically dominated the Hawks all day today, that wasnt the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly bro, Scot is probably one of the 3 most respected posters on the Huddle, should probably try and learn from what he says instead of acting like a fool trying to pretend you know more then him.

 

life lesson you need to learn is to know it's ok to admit when you are wrong.

 

I could care less who scot is.. I already said my peice about the 4th down and if you guys want to keep sucking each other off be my guest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If I recall correctly the colts won that game and when asked wny he went for it in his own territory, he said that it gave his team the best chance to win. He didn't want to give the ball back to Manning. Same thing happened with Mike Smith in the Saints game a couple years ago.

 

Here are 2 examples of coaches and teams who were willing to think outside of the box and do something unconventional because they felt it gave them the best chance to win.

 

 

Put the ball in the hands of your best player and let him win the game for you

 

Well they are apples to oranges comparisons because if NE got the first down the could kneel it out and the game was over.

 

Regardless it was a terrible decision that cost them the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typing on phone. In this situation of course I don't want to waste a timeout. I meant to say sometime in River as tenure. Point his he never takes a chance never any deception

And if it doesn't work waste a timeout in the second half of a close game??

Sent from my Motorola Galaxy s3 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Typing on phone. In this situation of course I don't want to waste a timeout. I meant to say sometime in River as tenure. Point his he never takes a chance never any deception

Sent from my Motorola Galaxy s3 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

 

I would agree with that.  I am just talking about today's game specifically

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And both failed.

 

You might want to find some better examples to suit your argument.

 

 

 

Thats not the point i'm arguing. I'm arguing that they play calls were aggressive and they put the ball in the hands of their best player to go out and win the game. We should have let our best player go out and make a play for us

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Taking only players from the sheet that are realistically available in or after the listed round, I’d like… 1st: DT Caleb Banks (Styles not realistic) 2nd: LB Jacob Rodriguez 3rd: OT Best available from Bowry, Barber, and Casey 4th: CB Daylen Everette 5th: S Jalen Huskey 6th: RB Adam Randall 7th: IOL Best available from Lemieux, Dawkins, Leausa, and Brose   I know nothing about some of the players listed, but it seems like that would be the best way it could fall for now. I’m sure the list of who we meet will change a ton, and there will also be players we don’t meet with to keep quiet. I’d love to pick up Randall in the late rounds. 
    • Not what I said. They know within the building why we aren't utilizing TEs more. If the rumors were true that we were seriously pursuing a couple of decent receiving TEs that strongly points toward a lack of quality receiving TEs currently on the roster. Does that mean we consider drafting one at 19? I don't know, but it wouldn't shock me and if we did there's only one guy it would be. I wouldn't be surprised at all to see TE drafting somewhere in the first three rounds. 
    • Yeah, I don’t know. Tepper was behind the Bryce selection. Behind firings and hiring over his lack of development.  He doesn’t have to literally tell them their hands are tied for them to know this. It is in the air constantly. The Canales Bryce play calling was even portrayed by more than one person as Canales failing Bryce, instead of Bryce being responsible for his own performance (except when he does well, then it is all him). Now they have an extra coach in, to help the new OC get results from this QB.  The atmosphere is not welcoming to prototypical young QBs that have talent. You get Jake Plummer types or old vets. I think we are stuck. 
×
×
  • Create New...