Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Balancing Our Offense Will Be A Fine Art


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

If we're even able to do it successfully.

Why?

Aside from the obvious reasons, the general premise isn't breaking news, but the game has dramatically changed. As has been discussed ad nauseam here, "3 yards and a cloud of dust" philosophies aren't just outdated now, they're ancient.

Look at the stats from yesterday's opening day games and the picture becomes that much clearer...

Can you guess the league's leading rusher?

Terrelle Pryor. A QB. He ran for 112 yards.

Now another interesting stat. Shane Vereen was the only RB in the league to eclipse the 100 yard mark in week 1.

Wow, we picked a good time to invest boat loads of money in a football philosophical dinosaur.

So, I certainly hope Shula plans to utilize our RBs to our advantage without handicapping our offense's ability to make big plays in the passing game. He must find the right balance between using Cam to his maximum potential in the passing game while utilizing him effectively in running situations along with our RBs without turning our offense into a Woody Hayes' wet dream.

I have to say, I was not happy with the lack of designed runs for Cam yesterday. His ability to run on designed plays often is the difference between scoring or sending out the punting unit on any given drive. I hope to see more of that going forward b/c the beauty of Cam is the pressure he puts on a defense with his potential for big plays passing or running is invaluable. Shula must find that balance. There's a time for buckling your chin strap and using a show of force running the ball, but it doesn't require you to abandon what makes your offense successful and dynamic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

 

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suckthey should be more than able to get the job done for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want to them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

 

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suckthey should be more than able to get the job done for us.

Unfortunately, he is the only one I trust with short yardage situations.  Although, Tolbert grinded one out.  There was some pretty nice designs in there that were executed well, but plenty blahs that weren't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of designed Cam runs, it's especailly frustrating in short yardage situations.  The 3rd and 2 comes to mind, I believe it was the first drive of the game.  We were moving the ball well with a mix of runs and intermediate throws.

 

Then we get the ball across the fifty and have a 3rd and 2, and Cam throws an incomplete pass.  I think that's the perfect situation for Cam to run the QB draw or QB power.  It's almost guaranteed to pick up a couple of yards.  If you are going to throw a pass there, at least make it a play-action. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

But that's why Cam's designed runs are so crucial. They don't require him to be a "battering ram." In my observations, his biggest gains come from designed runs out of pistol and/or spread formations. There wasn't nearly enough of those in there yesterday. We don't need him to run straight into a pile of defenders out of a goal line formation. He needs to operate with the chance that the pass could be coming, which is what makes him so dangerous to defenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the designed runs from Cam, I definitely want them in there to keep the defense honest. But we have far too much money invested in our running backs to be depending on our franchise QB to be a battering ram all the time.

If we utilize our backs properly and our OL doesn't suck, they should be more than able to get the job done for us.

I care more about first downs than who is getting paid what

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we have any excuses to not be able to put points on the board for our defense. Green Bay has an offensive line full of no-names. I can't remember when Pittsburgh was ever good at pass protecting. San Francisco, like us, has one great, yet aging slot receiver, a juiced up tight end as their number two option, and a bunch of guys, yet their QB just passed for 10,000 yards yesterday. There are plenty of winning teams with holes in their rosters just as big, if not bigger than ours, but they have success in spite of. That needs to change here and I expect better on Sundays.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also thought the HB screens were underutilized as well.

And as far as Cam, I also think they've been telling him to get down quicker which makes me think that using him as a runner is something they're trying to deemphasize and avoid. There were a few times when he did run yesterday that it appeared he dropped voluntarily a lot quicker than he ever did before, even when the first down was within reach. He appears to be avoiding contact as much as possible, which is smart, but I think it signals a shift in overall philosophy as far as how they want to use him this season... And that, I don't like

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of designed Cam runs, it's especailly frustrating in short yardage situations.  The 3rd and 2 comes to mind, I believe it was the first drive of the game.  We were moving the ball well with a mix of runs and intermediate throws.

 

Then we get the ball across the fifty and have a 3rd and 2, and Cam throws an incomplete pass.  I think that's the perfect situation for Cam to run the QB draw or QB power.  It's almost guaranteed to pick up a couple of yards.  If you are going to throw a pass there, at least make it a play-action. 

Later in the game Cam ran some power runs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
    • The Giants, Cardinals  and Dolphins should have moved on, but they didn't and ended up cutting their QB early into a monster second contract and had to eat a TON of dead cap money.
×
×
  • Create New...