Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who would you use as head coach?

xclr82xtc

By xclr82xtc,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

xclr82xtc Newbie

xclr82xtc

Posted
Posted

if you had your choice of any coach in the NFL.. or even college...  Who would you go for?

 

I think personally it have to be one of the Harbaugh Brothers as my first pick (prolly jim)   or Mike McCarthy...  MAYBE gary kubiak.... (always liked what he did with the texans)

 

 

and the best part of this entire post..

 

 

 

Chudpusy is last on the list!! i mean litterally! ..here see the list for yourself!

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/22790909/nfl-coach-rankings-personality-doesnt-matter-but-rings-sure-do

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

If I had any choice I would take Belichick over anyone with the caveat that he could not do our drafting.

Highly doubt you get Belichick without total control. His ego is almost an entity unto itself at this point.

I still prefer the 'build your own star' approach over any of the retread options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
teeray Collaborator

teeray

Posted
Posted

Belichick

College: David Shaw and Kevin Sumlin

Somebody bounced Sumlin's name around to me, and I have to admit he is intriguing.

Shaw would be nice but tough to get IMO.

I have always liked Petersen at Boise.

Charlie Strong is impressive to me but expensive.

The thing about getting a head coach is that they have an identity and belief in what they are doing because they have been successful.

Some people frown on stubborness (like Foxxy) but I think it can be good because I think coordinators are more susceptible to second guessing themselves and over correcting problems even if they don't really exist. Therefore it is hard to establish an identity. Create your identity and stick with it come hell or high water. Don't just change with the wind every time it isn't successful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carolina-chuck Newbie

carolina-chuck

Posted
Posted

Somebody bounced Sumlin's name around to me, and I have to admit he is intriguing.

Shaw would be nice but tough to get IMO.

I have always liked Petersen at Boise.

Charlie Strong is impressive to me but expensive.

The thing about getting a head coach is that they have an identity and belief in what they are doing because they have been successful.

Some people frown on stubborness (like Foxxy) but I think it can be good because I think coordinators are more susceptible to second guessing themselves and over correcting problems even if they don't really exist. Therefore it is hard to establish an identity. Create your identity and stick with it come hell or high water. Don't just change with the wind every time it isn't successful.

 

Yup, I absolutely agree.

 

When Foxy was here we knew exactly what his identity was: pound the football and played hard nose defense. Rivera has yet to identify what his identity is here in Carolina.

 

Hoping for the best with Rivera this season, but assuming if things go wrong I would wish that Sumlin would be a man Gman will target along with Greg Roman. Both of those guys have found success with mobile QBs (Kaep/Manziel) similar to Cam. It would be a match made in heaven if we could land one of those guy to coach Cam and this team. Also, we have found out that the NFL is not too big for college coaches to make the transition to.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
fieryprophet Contributor

fieryprophet

Posted
Posted

Who cares? One thing for sure is that Jim have a more consistent record of success to date than Rivera.

He's also an arrogant, infantile, emotionally volatile, duplicitous, glory-seeking, steaming pile of excrement masquerading as a head coach with a towering ego that overshadows his credible skills. Anyone with more than a cursory knowledge of Harbaugh's background knows that he has been very successful but that a lot of poisoned relationships and bad blood follows him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • frankw
      BREAKING!!! Panthers signing Packers LT Rasheed Walker

      By frankw · Posted

      The OL has certainly been better than the trainwreck it was three or four years ago. As far as competitiveness let's apply some realism and clarity here. Quite a bit of the competitiveness in 2025 came from the defensive side of the ball which gave up the most points in league history the year before and was one of the bottom 5 units in terms of salary cap allocation for 2025 while the OL was top 3. We had the 26th passing offense last year. And if not for a herculean couple of games from Rico Dowdle we don't back our way into the division title or make the playoffs because we went 4-6 in our final ten games including being swept by the Saints who were starting a rookie 2nd round pick most of us mercilessly mocked when they selected him. In conclusion yes we've seen a difference. The question now is will the investment pay off the way we want. But the only way that happens is if we field a top 15 offense. If we can't even crack the top 20 then there need to be some very warm seats across the board. And I would hope just about anyone here should agree with that.
    • HardcoreHokie
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By HardcoreHokie · Posted

      These Spurs are lowkey loaded.  If healthy, they could win it all this year (#2 in the West right now). I still think we’ve gotta keep Kalk on Wemby; he’s not getting completely dominated like every other NBA center.
    • tukafan21
      At this point its Sadiq or bust... A

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Am I the only one who doesn't understand this fan bases infatuation with adding a high end TE? Especially when we have some bigger bodies in T-Mac and Coker who can slide into the slot at times and provide the big dependable target over the middle that most teams use their TE for. I mean, sure, it would be nice to have one of those elite TE's, but I feel like that's a position your better off going cheap with a committee who each bring something different to the table while spending our cap room on the more important positions. I like the potential we saw from Evans this year, Sanders could be a best if he can stay healthy, and Tremble has improved as well.  Just feels like spending high draft picks or cap space on other needs and more important positions is a better use of our resources than splashing on a TE in the draft or FA. Are those guys on the level of the Bowers or McBride's of the world?  Of course not, but we also are paying a fraction of the cost on our TE room than they are, and we're able to use that money for other needs.
×
×
  • Create New...