Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

On 3rd or 4th-and-1, the Panthers are 35 of 43 in the Cam Era


UNCrules2187

Recommended Posts

What is unquestionably true is that the Panthers are a wildly successful team in short yardage. Since Rivera took over and the Panthers drafted Cam Newton first overall, Carolina has run the ball on third-and-1 or fourth-and-1 43 times. It has converted 35 of those runs for first downs or touchdowns, meaning that its break-even rate on those plays has been a whopping 81.4 percent. Newton, in particular, has been near-unstoppable: He is 16-for-18 on those carries as a pro. You wouldn't want to risk sneaking him on every single short-yardage play just for the purposes of keeping him healthy, but with the game on the line, you simply have to turn to Newton. And even if you don't, Carolina's backfield is full of expensive running backs; Jonathan Stewart is hurt, but the Panthers could just as easily have handed the ball to DeAngelo Williams or Mike Tolbert. Even if you want to accuse that data of being too small to analyze, what do you think Carolina's "true" success rate is if it ran the ball a million times with a yard to go against an average defense? Would it convert 60 percent of the time? 70 percent? Literally, if the Panthers had to sit down and write a résumé, the first strength they would mention is their effectiveness in short yardage. And yet, Rivera turned down another opportunity to use that strength to seal a victory.

 

http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/9680034/bill-barnwell-week-2-nfl-season

 

Barney-kills-himself-how-i-met-your-moth

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guarantee you that if the players saw this and didn't have their heads up their asses, they wouldn't be thinking rivera was such a good coach and be blaming themselves for so many close losses and games lost by less than seven.

 

the problem is in game management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i guarantee you that if the players saw this and didn't have their heads up their asses, they wouldn't be thinking rivera was such a good coach and be blaming themselves for so many close losses and games lost by less than seven.

 

the problem is in game management.

 

True. 

 

But everyone keeps talking about the 4th and 1. Why?

 

Rivera had no intention of scoring a TD on that last drive. It was clear he was only trying to burn out the clock, to kick a FG to close the game. He never wanted to score a TD. 

 

I knew exactly what he was doing, and said to myself at the time "watch Rivera run down the clock", only to give the ball back to Buffalo, and let them miraculously win". 

 

He does the same thing, over and over again, handicapping this offense and team. And then we expect different. 

 

SMH

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it was fear of the unknown because he tried to hide the extent of the injuries that made him drop. After the drop, the reports I heard were that teams knew what was wrong with his knee and it was something similar to another athlete from a few years ago (honestly don't remember if it was even a football player).  That it was basically one of those things where he should be fine for a while, there isn't a huge concern of immediate injury risk.   But what he has going on with his knee is something that is degenerative and there's little chance he'll be able to play more than 5 or so years on it before he won't be able to play anymore. So basically it was teams knowing if they draft him, he's probably going to be only a rookie contract player and even if he's great, you might not be able to get use out of him on a second contract.  Which in turn makes the drop make sense, but I'm kinda surprised some contending team didn't take him late in the 1st, hoping he'd put them over the top on a SB run but then not even have to worry about giving him a big contract in 4 years too.
    • Depends if they see the writing on the wall with their roster and contracts and decide to bite the bullet and begin a complete rebuild and roster overhaul.  I have no clue why some franchises (IE us) refuse to do this and keep half assing trying to win 8 games or so.  Do it correctly, take your lumps and build a contender.  We shall see what loomis decides.
    • Each team plays 17 games.  I do not see why they don't just have each team play one international game per year.  Neutral site game, 8 home, 8 away.    
×
×
  • Create New...