Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 the Year of the Sequel!


charlotte49er

Recommended Posts

Jurassic Park IV

Godzilla 2

Star Wars VII

 

All in 3D!

 

Robocop (Reboot)

 

300: Rise of an Empire

A Haunted House 2 

Rio 2

Captain America: The Winter Soldier

The Amazing Spiderman 2

Legend of Oz: Dorothy's Return

X-Men: Days of Future Past

Transformers 4

How to Train your Dragon 2

22 Jump Street

Fast & Furious 7

Dawn of the Planet of the Apes

The Expendables 3

Resident Evil 6

Dolphin Tales 2

Sin City: A Dame to Kill For

Paranormal Activity 5

Horrible Boss 2

The Hunger Games: Mockingjay part 1

Night at the Museum 3

The Hobbit: There and Back Again

Dumb and Dumber To

 

it looks like around 2/3rds of the movies will be sequels! (A few re-boots in there as well.)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm looking forward to watching Paranormal Activity 27 with my grandkids.

 

'Horrible Bosses' and '21 Jump Street' needed sequels?  What i saw of 'Jump Street' made 'Charlies Angels' look like high art.

 

Where is there to go with 'Night at the Museum' at this point?

 

Sheesh :(

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There isn't a single movie on this list I'll waste my time with. Matter of fact, I saw but 6 of the originals listed and those were questionable decisions.

 

Ever wonder why there weren't sequels to "Lost in Translation" or "Shawshank" or "Schindler's List?" Because they got the point across in a single film. The list above is a shitload of pointless movies, thereby allowing for as many sequels as someone wants to make for an easy dollar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many dumb and dumberers are they going to make? Not watching unless it's with Carey. Too lazy to open a new tab and imdb it

 

I think there has been 2 counting the original, but this one (the "third" one) WILL have the original guys.

 

I actually think there's a lot of cool stuff on that list.  I mean of course super hero movies will get sequels, there's 50 years+ of material out there for them.  X-Men should be good times with all those actors in it.  Hobbit looks awesome as well.

 

If you haven't seen the first of of the "new" Planet of the Apes (called Rise of I think) it was actually really, really good.   (Not the Mark Walberg one lol).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As said on here before, "Please stop going to see Paranormal Activity" so they will stop making them...

 

Looking forward to the Plant of the Apes, HungerGames, X-Men & Spiderman. Will be taking the kids to Rio2 & How to train your Dragon2, loved the 1st Dragon movie...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...