Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Does Mikell help us Sunday like Blackburn did against the Giants?


panthers55

Recommended Posts

One of the things that fans may forget is that Quinton Mikell played for the Rams last year.  He was their third leading tackler garnering 114 tackles and 3 sacks. 

 

It seemed like Blackburn was in the backfield when we played the Giants because he knew their plays and what they wanted to do.  I wonder if that could help us Sunday given Mikell knows the Rams offense.

 

Sure I know folks will say that this happens all the time and it doesn't really make that much of a difference but if we were playing the Giants this weekend, would them having Beason make a difference?  Will the fact that Mikell knows what plays they run out of the formations help him know where to play.  Sure we know that coaches watch film and have already told folks what the Rams will do and how to respond. So the scouting aspect is not that big a deal.  Still when a player is very familiar with another team scheme they can individually play faster and respond instead of think about it and then responding. Plus he will be motivated to show them what he has left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CRA is right, very little chance he can offer anything in the way of schematics. however he has faced most of those offensive guys before in practice, so he's going to be the guy most familiar with their personnel. hopefully he'll be able to offer a little bit there to give us an edge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rams have a new DC....so I would think that would rule him out knowing the inside and out like Chase with the NY D

Defending the Rams O....may help some. Mikell is a pretty savy

I'm sure the OP was talking about him helping vs the Rams' offense. That's who he would be going against, not the defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if anything Mikel is a liability for us going into the game. If anybody knows his tendencies and weaknesses it's the Rams!

There's a reason he's not a Ram, and I'm not buying the whole "salary cap" reason either.

It will be awesome to see Tavon Austin finally have a break out game against US of all people. (Huddle will implode about why we didn't draft Austin and why we still don't have a compliment to Smitty) Rams win this one in a blowout due to Mikel being burnt continuously in play action by Austin.

(Note: every win we have has been after I post something like this... So here's to hoping that it keeps working)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the OP was talking about him helping vs the Rams' offense. That's who he would be going against, not the defense.

OP mentioned both sides....

Chase likely did help with both sides. He could aid Cam/Shula with what NY does defensively.

I mean traditionally, that is where former players aid the most. Helping provide insight on what they did on their side of the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that he gives us much of an edge in scouting information since honestly coaches have broken down game tape from this year and we know what they will do and this has been passed along to players in meeting and practice.  What I was mostly focusing on (or thought I was) was on whether playing every day against the Rams offense last year would give him a personal advantage in knowing what was coming and what Bradford would do or which guys he favors in what situations. Plus would he be especially motivated to play well and show the Rams what he had left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that he gives us much of an edge in scouting information since honestly coaches have broken down game tape from this year and we know what they will do and this has been passed along to players in meeting and practice. What I was mostly focusing on (or thought I was) was on whether playing every day against the Rams offense last year would give him a personal advantage in knowing what was coming and what Bradford would do or which guys he favors in what situations. Plus would he be especially motivated to play well and show the Rams what he had left.

I would not be shocked to see him come up and step in front of some of Bradford short work for a INT.

Mikell is smart. I am sure he knows lots of Bradford's habits....Bradford has been playing small ball for some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

blackburn did help a lot with scouting the giants O. he knew what they were going to do pretty much at all times and he helped the rest of the D know it.

 

i fully expect mikell to help us know how to work the rams offense. the guy is smart. he may not know their O as well as blackburn did, but that's only because blackburn spent more time in NY.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...