Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another Bad NFL.com reporter/list


Peppers90 NC

Recommended Posts

Don't worry by the time the season starts there is a good chance he'll probably have to change his mind.

wE bE gEtTiNg nO rEsPeCt!

Sportsnation on ESPN Has DWill as the most overrated RB because he dosen't get enough carries. Projections on Sportsnation had AP #1 with 1700 yards and Turner #1 with 14 TDs.

This is gonna be a great year to prove everybody wrong and by mid November they will all be snuggling our sack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beason was rated 4 on the video. Just about where I'd expect him at this point, he'll move up...

Yea, of course the ex-NFL player ranked him in top 5, if you scroll down the list though the other guy didn't have Beas on there at all and had Briggs over Urlacher for inside

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, of course the ex-NFL player ranked him in top 5, if you scroll down the list though the other guy didn't have Beas on there at all and had Briggs over Urlacher for inside

Well, you get respect from some and it actually changes week to week if you have noticed, but not with all. Just natural. Beason will earn his, I have no doubt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...