Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Was Losing Godfrey The Biggest Step In Turning The Defense Around?


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

I thought Godfrey was okay. Much better than some are giving him credit.

 

With that being said, Mitchell is a baller. He is on another level. Not just of Carolina safeties, but in the league. I think he just needed to get out of Oakland to show his skill, and landing on Carolina with this front seven was a match made in heaven for him. I distinctly recall him having to harass Cam last season. Why is your safety the only guy harassing the QB? The answer is likely no one else could. Maybe I'll rewatch the game to confirm...

 

So yes, losing Godfrey was necessary for Ron to give Mitchell a real chance.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk chuck, I kinda blame Fox for that one. He had part in who to draft, but he made the decision to put them there. Same way with AE

I look back at Hurney/Fox, I don't see how ANYBODY, ANYBODY supported them. It was time for kick rocks once we got eliminated by Arizona. They should have gone bye bye right after that game along with Jake

I agree. Foxy is as much to be blame for it. Foxy started taking his own style of guys. Hurney should've been smart enough to build the team his way, not Foxy. The love between the two cost both of them their jobs.

I think the reason why Jake was brought back was bc we had no 1st rd pick in the 09 draft. We were in no position to draft a young gun. I don't know who was available in FA but probably not anyone better than Jake. Tho that contract should have not happened.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Godfrey didn't play enough to even compare statistics.

Week 1 games are always odd and most "experts" but little meaning into those bc they are so unpredictable. That is all Godfrey has on his resume this year

 

Yet we want to say somehow the defense improved when Godfrey left.

 

I don't know why we have to bend the facts six ways to Sunday to prove a point (or, what it looks like to me, grind an axe), and most don't really have a problem with it.

 

What improved our defense has more to do with the new additions in the middle and getting a large swath of serviceable CB's to rotate through in nickle formations than anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I though mitchell was going to start anyway he was injured that was the reason we signed mikell right??? So it would be godfrey and mitchell at safety so Mitchell playing good has nothing to do with godfrey getting injured he was going to start anyway if im correct.

Difference is that Mitchell is now playing free safety, the position that Godfrey was playing before the injury. While it could have to do with factors other than just the position (comfort with the scheme, etc.), I daresay Mitchell is playing much better at free safety than he was at strong safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...