Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If the chiefs give up 18 points to the broncos tonight...


Jase

Recommended Posts

They give up 18 or more we allow less ppg

 

I'm no math major but through 9 games KC has allowed 111 points. (12.33 ppg).  Through 9 games we have allowed 115 points (12.77 ppg).  Hypothetically speaking if we shut out New England then through 10 games we would have allowed 115 points (11.5 ppg).  If KC gave up 5 points against Denver then they would have allowed 116 points (11.6 ppg).  So I'm wondering why the magic number of 18?  Am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

it's actually 17.  17 points means KC will have allowed 128 points through 10 games (12.8 ppg) vs our 12.77 PPG.  It's only valid until we play our game tomorrow.  Like I said, we'll likely have the top scoring defense for only a day.

 

We're talking PPG, not total points allowed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no math major but through 9 games KC has allowed 111 points. (12.33 ppg).  Through 9 games we have allowed 115 points (12.77 ppg).  Hypothetically speaking if we shut out New England then through 10 games we would have allowed 115 points (11.5 ppg).  If KC gave up 5 points against Denver then they would have allowed 116 points (11.6 ppg).  So I'm wondering why the magic number of 18?  Am I missing something?

 

Yes, you are. If KC gives up exactly 17 they will have allowed 12.8 ppg, Panthers have allowed 12.77 ppg in games actually played.  So, Panters #1 until their game Monday.

 

Based on score with 5 minutes left, KC has allowed 13.8 points per game. For Carolina to remain #1, they would have to give up less than 23 points to the Patriots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here in lies the rub that the supporting posters continue to ignore. He wasn’t a 2nd round pick in the 2025 class, especially with an ACL tear. It was a dumb pick for any GM who looks ahead to determine values. C and CB were much better values than an injured RB in 2024. If a RB isn’t even playing much in 2024, you have to compare him to 2025. We’re beating a dead horse but only because the defense of the pick is almost comical at this point. We’ve made a ton of poo picks and moves/non trades while Morgan was GM and the assistant GM. It happens, we don’t have to jump through hoops to act like we just had some really bad luck. The 2025 draft class is unknown so far but damn it felt way better afterwards for the first time in a long time. Embrace the potential and stop stamping guaranteed on the box of poo of the 2018-2024 drafts. We are were we aware because of them and 2025 has to hit so we can get past the 7 win max in 7 year hurdle.
    • Oh for those tired of the Mannings I have bad news, Peytons son Marshal already has college teams after him and he isn't even in HS until this fall...   I'd wager we have two Mannings in the NFL in 2030
    • Push em to the brink!!! Shut em down Freddie!
×
×
  • Create New...