Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We need to change conversation from getting in the playoffs to "can we win the Super Bowl?"


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

I'm going to say yes. We'll be favored in every game the rest of the season except the 2 Saints game. We'll probably split with the Saints and lose a game we should win and finish 11-5 or 12-4. We're the hottest team in football knocking off two contenders in a row. We can do it with offense OR defense. There should be no team we fear from here on out: Denver, Seattle, New Orleans...who cares. They should be fearing us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The rules:

A game-winning drive for the purposes of this bet means that:

Cam must be on the field the entire drive. Wildcat plays are fine, if he's hurt and Anderson finishes it off, it doesn't count.

The drive must start at the 50 or anywhere in Panthers territory.

Cam must complete at least 1 pass for positive yards on the drive.

The clock has to be under 5 minutes left when we take over.

We must be tied or trailing when we take over.

We must score a touchdown. The only way I'll count a field goal is if it's to win the game with under 10 seconds left.

You must have over 3,000 posts to enter and this is subject to change according to the approval of Zod or any other admin (Kurb maybe? Can't remember how it works here anymore.) I'd like it to be the first person with over 3,000 posts that wants to do it.

If Cam succeeds, I'll donate $100 to the charity of your choice within 2 weeks of whenever it happens. If Cam doesn't succeed, you'll donate $100 to St. Jude's Children Research Hospital within 2 weeks of the end of the season.

Anyone in? People should be chomping at the bit since everyone still believes in Cam, right?

post-11341-0-51570300-1384839590_thumb.g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as we split the Aints games and win out we take the division as long as Seattle destroys the Aints at home.  With that we'd have a bye with Seatlle and gotta hope some other team upsets them in their home.  That place is hell man.  They haven't lost there in almost 2 years now and theres a reason why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need to stop having threads with people telling us what we're supposed to think about our football team.

 

 

Screw this crap.

 

I just want to keep winning.

 

 

I'll enjoy this for the next hour and a half, and then I'll be grumpy again because I want another win next week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to say yes. We'll be favored in every game the rest of the season except the 2 Saints game. We'll probably split with the Saints and lose a game we should win and finish 11-5 or 12-4. We're the hottest team in football knocking off two contenders in a row. We can do it with offense OR defense. There should be no team we fear from here on out: Denver, Seattle, New Orleans...who cares. They should be fearing us.

 

I guess what you say is possible.  Depends on if you think we can with our quarterback.  Think his name is Cam Newton.  Do you think he can lead us to a Superbowl now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Helllllll nah! This dude does not get to come in here and a make thread about us winning the SB when the b***h was shouting how Cam would never have a 4th qtr win etc etc. No. F**k these types of fans. This clown seriously needs to GTFO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to say yes. We'll be favored in every game the rest of the season except the 2 Saints game. We'll probably split with the Saints and lose a game we should win and finish 11-5 or 12-4. We're the hottest team in football knocking off two contenders in a row. We can do it with offense OR defense. There should be no team we fear from here on out: Denver, Seattle, New Orleans...who cares. They should be fearing us.

 

Hey SMF, check out this thread:

 

 

It's just for you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...