Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not giving up on HFA = rooting for taints?


PntherPryd

Recommended Posts

First things first, gotta take care of the bucs on Sunday.  But if we do it sets up an interesting dilemma for Panther Fans on MNF.....

 

Do we root for the taints?

 

We have already lost the head 2 head with Seattle, we need them to collect some "L's". Specifically 2-2 down the stretch.

We have both games left with Saints and control that destiny.  Plus I think we match up better than many expect against teams like the taints.

 

On Tuesday early morning, we could be tied with the saints for the division record with a seahawk victory.  But why settle for division title?  With a Saint victory (and with us beating the bucs) we would be 9-3, Saints would be 10-2 and Seahawks would be 10-2.

 

We put up 2 losses on the taints, and the seahawks lose 2 of 3 remaining NFC West Division games (not out of the question) and we are in drivers seat for HFA.  Obviously a lot of variables but not out of the question.  We have to win out.

 

Remaining games after this week;

 

Panthers          @ saints, jets, saints, @ falcons

Saints               panthers, @rams, @panthers, bucs

Seahawks         @niners, @giants, cards, rams

 

So again, how important is this game tomorrow?  We aren't out of HFA..... so root for the taints or set our sights on division title by rooting for a taint loss?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First things first, gotta take care of the bucs on Sunday.  But if we do it sets up an interesting dilemma for Panther Fans on MNF.....

 

Do we root for the taints?

 

 

 

  Sounds good to me - but only after:

 

We give the deed to our country to Iran.

 

We admit soccer is a sport - and Nascar too.

 

We tell the satellite company we'll drop NFL Network for an extra Hallmark Channel.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its highly improbable that we'd be able to get the #1 seed at this point. Even if we finish 13-3, Seattle would have to go 2-3 in its final 5 games, and they are 10-1. Do you really expect them to do that.

 

Winning the division would be gravy right now because its a 1st round bye and a game at home. If we don't win the division, we have road games against N.O. and Seattle in the playoffs if we are lucky enough to get by in the 1st round against NFCN winner (Lions have enough pieces to beat us in a game, Chicago and GB do not)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yep so its essentially working against us
    • Solid point about the rookie contract especially since I believe Tepper and company brought that up, he was so good we could sign other players while he is on a rookie deal and capitalize on the cap space. Sorta like Seattle did with Russ while he was on a rookie deal. But, problem is Bryce isn’t close to that version of Russ and Tepper sucks as an owner. 
    • Look at who they’re interviewing there.  parcels, aikman, Peyton etc. the youngest guy is KOC who’s forty.  The passing game 25, 35, 45 years ago looked less glamorous to be sure but it was far more complex. You didn’t have these packages where you’d make quick checks, every play was its own thing, basically everyone was playing under center etc. once the nfl got out of the dead ball era things became very complex very quickly and they hadnt figured out a way to truncate it. Plus it was nowhere in college or high school. Vertical passing attacks just didn’t exist.  So yeah parcells probably does have that view because that’s what he came up in. Aikman had to learn that when he got to the nfl. Aikman was so lost his rookie season the cowboys almost took Jeff George first overall in 1990.  Today the learning curve is a lot lower. pro concepts today borrow a great deal from the college game now. Tons of air raid stuff, RPO, pistol, etc. even though everything is faster at every position, it’s schematically more simple. The learning curve is nowhere near what it was for even Peyton manning when he came out.  plus, prospects today are basically pro qbs from the time they’re in middle school. Bryce Young for example lived in invite only qb camps since he reached his max height at 12 years old. The whole “they shouldn’t get paid because they get a degree for free” was always just an insincere argument from racist old people, but no one even pretends to make it anymore. Playing qb at a division 1 school is a full time job for years before you even get to campus.  And that is all they do. The days of people excelling in multiple sports to the point there’s pro interest and then just choosing one or the other and succeeding are over. Aikman was drafted by the Mets out of high school and decided to go start as a freshman at Oklahoma.  The exact opposite is happening now, to the point you’ve got guys going to play baseball for a few years, coming back to college football, and playing until they’re like 27.  that’s actually one of the theories about why darnold isn’t better than everyone feels he should be. He only played two years of college football. In highschool he was first team all everything in every sport. Dude has an insane athletic pedigree. But there’s at least four years of highschool invite camps he never got to go to. You can’t just be the most athletic guy in the room anymore.  So obviously the older guys are complaining about how things are done; it’s what offer guys do. But the pro game today is much more accessible for these guys than it was back in their day, and the players are more ready for the transition. Like is anyone defending Anthony Richardson? What im saying is we know what Bryce young is and we should t wait for waiting’s sake. 
×
×
  • Create New...