Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Not giving up on HFA = rooting for taints?


PntherPryd

Recommended Posts

First things first, gotta take care of the bucs on Sunday.  But if we do it sets up an interesting dilemma for Panther Fans on MNF.....

 

Do we root for the taints?

 

We have already lost the head 2 head with Seattle, we need them to collect some "L's". Specifically 2-2 down the stretch.

We have both games left with Saints and control that destiny.  Plus I think we match up better than many expect against teams like the taints.

 

On Tuesday early morning, we could be tied with the saints for the division record with a seahawk victory.  But why settle for division title?  With a Saint victory (and with us beating the bucs) we would be 9-3, Saints would be 10-2 and Seahawks would be 10-2.

 

We put up 2 losses on the taints, and the seahawks lose 2 of 3 remaining NFC West Division games (not out of the question) and we are in drivers seat for HFA.  Obviously a lot of variables but not out of the question.  We have to win out.

 

Remaining games after this week;

 

Panthers          @ saints, jets, saints, @ falcons

Saints               panthers, @rams, @panthers, bucs

Seahawks         @niners, @giants, cards, rams

 

So again, how important is this game tomorrow?  We aren't out of HFA..... so root for the taints or set our sights on division title by rooting for a taint loss?

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First things first, gotta take care of the bucs on Sunday.  But if we do it sets up an interesting dilemma for Panther Fans on MNF.....

 

Do we root for the taints?

 

 

 

  Sounds good to me - but only after:

 

We give the deed to our country to Iran.

 

We admit soccer is a sport - and Nascar too.

 

We tell the satellite company we'll drop NFL Network for an extra Hallmark Channel.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its highly improbable that we'd be able to get the #1 seed at this point. Even if we finish 13-3, Seattle would have to go 2-3 in its final 5 games, and they are 10-1. Do you really expect them to do that.

 

Winning the division would be gravy right now because its a 1st round bye and a game at home. If we don't win the division, we have road games against N.O. and Seattle in the playoffs if we are lucky enough to get by in the 1st round against NFCN winner (Lions have enough pieces to beat us in a game, Chicago and GB do not)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think we are looking at the same stats, I think you just have pro-Bryce goggles on.  That seems to be pretty clear by the post history, anyway.  Not really sure how or why anyone would still be in that camp, but carry on.
    • I would argue their play during their respective seasons was elite, and they elevated those around them.  Regardless of what they became after that moment.
    • Right team, wrong year and player. Since the 2003 season, there are only 2 SB winning QB's who won't end up in the HOF (Hurts not included as I think that's still up in the air), would be Flacco and Foles. The next worst QB to win in that time frame would be Eli, followed by Wilson, and then Big Ben. The other SB winning QB's since then... Brady, Mahomes, Stafford, Peyton, Rodgers, Brees... basically some of the best to ever play the game and Stafford, a surefire HOFer after winning his SB. You have to go back to the 2002 season to find a truly average QB to have won the SB with Brad Johnson and then 2 years before that with Dilfer.  Before that, you have to go all the way back to the 1991 season when the Redskins won, everyone else between there are HOFers.
×
×
  • Create New...