Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Explaining Carolina's chances to make the playoffs.


hepcat

Recommended Posts

EDIT:  Clinching Scenarios for Week 15

 

CAROLINA can clinch a playoff berth with:

  1. CAR win + ARI loss + SF loss + DAL loss or tie
  2. CAR win + ARI loss + SF loss + PHI loss or tie

 

Most of you are probably already aware of the playoff scenarios for Carolina but allow me to help explain them a little better.  There are realistically three teams competing for two wild card spots in the NFC - Arizona, San Francisco, and Carolina.  Currently Carolina and San Francisco are 9-4, and Arizona is 8-5.  Carolina holds the tiebreaker over San Francisco because of a head-to-head win.  San Francisco holds the tiebreaker over Arizona, and Arizona holds the tiebreaker over Carolina.  After playing with the Playoff Machine for a little bit, I better understand Carolina's chances to make the playoffs.  http://espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs/machine

 

If Carolina, San Francisco and Arizona all finish with the same record, Carolina would be the #5 seed, San Francisco would be the #6 seed, and Arizona would miss the playoffs.  If Carolina and Arizona end up with the same record, but San Francisco finishes with a better record than both, Carolina misses the playoffs.  This holds true through the final three weeks.  

 

Final opponents for all three teams:

 

Carolina:  NYJ, NO, @ATL

Arizona: @TEN, @SEA, SF

San Francisco: @TB, ATL, @ARI

 

Because Arizona and San Francisco play each other in Week 17, Carolina can afford one more loss, finish 11-5, and still be assured a playoff spot.  If San Francisco wins, it would drop Arizona to 10-6 if they won their other two remaining games, and they'd finish below Carolina.  If Arizona wins, it would drop San Francisco to 11-5 if they won their other two remaining games.  Like I said earlier, even if Arizona wins out and Carolina loses one, they'd all finish 11-5 and Carolina would win the tiebreaker.  Everything goes to hell if Carolina drops two of their remaining three games and Arizona and San Francisco both win their next two games.  Needless to say, next weeks game against the Jets is a must-win.

 

TL;DR - Carolina still has a great chance to make the playoffs even if they lose one more game.  But if they lose two more...all bets are off.

 

EDIT:  Okay so for those asking if San Francisco and Arizona both lose in Week 15, will Carolina make the playoffs, the answer is no.  Carolina still has a chance to finish 10-6 or even 9-7 regardless of what Arizona and San Francisco do in Week 15.  Also, it should be noted, that if Dallas or Philadelphia finish at 10-6, they would own the tiebreaker over Carolina because of conference record.  There are a lot of scenarios where Carolina misses out of the playoffs if they finish at 10-6 to either Arizona, Philadelphia, or Dallas.  There are even scenarios where Carolina, Arizona, San Francisco, Dallas, and Philly all finish 10-6.  Like I said before, if Carolina, Arizona and San Fran all finish with the same record, Carolina wins the tiebreaker.  It seems Carolina owns the tiebreaker over Chicago and Detroit.  All in all, to be guaranteed a playoff spot, Carolina needs to win two of their next three.  After that they get into the muddle mess of tiebreakers and you don't want to be there.  This post to show how Carolina would make the playoffs if they only lost one more game, and who their main competition would be if they only lost one more game.  If they lose two more games, like I said, all bets are off.

 

TL;DR AGAIN: It gets REALLY complicated if the Panthers lose two of their last three and finish 10-6.  But finish 11-5 and they are guaranteed a spot.  There is not a scenario that I found where Carolina misses the playoffs if they get to 11 wins. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we will get to 11 with wins over the Jets and Falcons. that's enough to get in. The N and E divisions can't get two teams to 11, and both the 9ers and Cards can't. So we're in even if we get swept by NO. Of course that would royally suck dog balls, but at least we'll make the playoffs and take another huge step forward towards building the dynasty team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

phew, nice to see Seattle on Arizona's schedule.

 

That is nice, but keep in mind Arizona still owns the tiebreaker over Carolina.  If both teams finish 10-6 (Carolina drops two and Arizona loses to Seattle but wins their other two games) and San Francisco wins two out of three, Carolina would miss the playoffs.  That Arizona-San Francisco game in Week 17 could be a very pivotal game for Carolina.  Or it might not matter at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@NYJ - looked a lot easier a week ago. Hopefully Geno throws up another stinker for us.

NO - it would be extremely nice to get revenge and go into playoffs letting them know we can beat them

@ATL - isn't a walk in the park either.. they would love to play spoiler for us

 

Honestly I'm hoping Carolina can win their next two and be guaranteed a playoff spot...but who knows with this team.  Losing to the Jets at home would be very typical of the Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is nice, but keep in mind Arizona still owns the tiebreaker over Carolina.  If both teams finish 10-6 (Carolina drops two and Arizona loses to Seattle but wins their other two games) and San Francisco wins two out of three, Carolina would miss the playoffs.  That Arizona-San Francisco game in Week 17 could be a very pivotal game for Carolina.  Or it might not matter at all.

 

 

I'm thinking ARI will lose to SEA and SF.

 

If that happens, we could lose the next 2 out of 3 and still make the playoffs it appears. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@NYJ - looked a lot easier a week ago. Hopefully Geno throws up another stinker for us.

NO - it would be extremely nice to get revenge and go into playoffs letting them know we can beat them

@ATL - isn't a walk in the park either.. they would love to play spoiler for us

If we can manage to win our next two and clinch the #5 seed, it would be nice to play ATL with the outcome being meaningless and possibly allow Anderson to get some reps before the playoffs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can manage to win our next two and clinch the #5 seed, it would be nice to play ATL with the outcome being meaningless and possibly allow Anderson to get some reps before the playoffs...

 

Well, even if Carolina wins their next two games, San Francisco could also win their next two games going into Week 17.  Carolina would still likely make the playoffs, but that game would be the difference in the #5 and #6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Here’s a summary of the JJ and Luke podcast transcript. Opening / Bryce Young Fifth-Year Option     •    JJ: Breaking news — Panthers picked up Bryce Young’s fifth-year option at $25.9M, guaranteed, coming in 2027. Combined with his 2025 salary of ~$6M, that’s $31M over two years — called it a “no-brainer.”     •    Luke: Enthusiastic about the move. Highlighted Bryce’s improving TD/INT ratios (11/10 → 15/9 → 23/11) and the value of entering year three with Dave Canales. Noted $25M is a bargain relative to the $60M top of market. Luke’s Personal Update — Charlotte Christian Football     •    Luke: Working with Charlotte Christian school football program, which hired a new head coach. Coaches include Greg Olsen, Luke, and Greg’s dad Chris Olsen (a New Jersey State coaching Hall of Famer).     •    JJ: Jokingly quipped that Charlotte Christian’s coaching staff is “the world’s greatest” — a Fox analyst, a Hall of Famer, and the best Panthers RB ever — all coaching middle school football.     •    Luke: Praised Chris Olsen’s deep football knowledge spanning decades and his ability to connect with kids. Round 1, Pick 19 — Monroe Freeling, OT, Georgia     •    JJ: Panthers were on the clock and submitted their pick almost immediately — a sign of confidence and preparation. Freeling is 6’7”, 320 lbs, played in the SEC in a pro-style system.     •    Luke: Loved the pick. Emphasized you can never have too many quality offensive linemen. Noted Freeling’s size, athleticism, and arm length as key traits. Said the pick also reflects team’s philosophy of drafting great people, not just great players.     •    JJ: Noted reporter Darren Gantt compared Freeling favorably to Jordan Gross — bigger, heavier, and faster — as a potential franchise left tackle.     •    Luke: Pointed out that young players like Freeling still have physical development ahead of them, comparing the trajectory to Christian McCaffrey’s growth from age 20 onward. Round 2, Pick 49 — Lee Hunter, DT, Texas Tech     •    JJ: Panthers traded up from 51 to 49 (pick swap with Minnesota) to grab Hunter. Played audio from Panthers area scout Kaden McLuhan, who scouted Hunter.     •    Scout Kaden McLuhan (audio): Said Hunter’s size is immediately striking, and that everyone around him spoke glowingly about his character, energy, and love for the game.     •    Luke: Praised Hunter as a massive (6’3”, 320 lbs, ~34” arms) two-gap nose tackle who fits perfectly in the Evero defense. Compared his prospect profile to Akiem Hicks. Said having Derek Brown, Bobby Brown, Derrick Brown, Terson Wharton, and now Hunter creates varied body types that stress offensive linemen.     •    JJ: Noted Hunter ranked third among all prospects in run-stuff rate and sixth in interior pass-rush win rate — addressing a perception that he couldn’t rush the passer. Rounds 3–7 Highlights     •    Luke: Highlighted WR Brazle (3rd round, 6’4”, 437 speed, 1,000+ yards at Tennessee) as the vertical threat the offense needed. Also praised OL Sam Heck (5th round) as a technically sound player whose “short arms” caused him to fall but who has proven himself.     •    Luke: Mentioned CB Will Lee (6’1”, 33” arms) fits the Panthers’ DB prototype — big, long corners.     •    Luke: Praised S/LB hybrid Zaki Wheatley (5th round, 6’3”) as a big nickel similar to Trayvon Merek.     •    Luke: Excited about the linebacker competition between Devin Lloyd, Trevvin Wallace, and Claudin Cherless.     •    JJ: Noted Panthers had the #1 “steal/overreach” rating in the entire draft — drafting players lower than consensus big boards projected. Around the League     •    Luke: Admitted being “a little jealous” that the Miami Dolphins drafted LB Jacob Rodriguez (Luke’s favorite LB in the draft). Has personal connections to Miami’s coaching staff (Jeff Hafley, DC Shawn Dugen — a childhood teammate).     •    Luke: Also noted Miami’s selection of OT/G Kaden Proctor out of Alabama, who will likely move to guard. League Trends — Bigger Tight Ends / 12 & 13 Personnel     •    JJ: Observed the NFL saw its highest run rate in ~11 years (~52%) and a notable pivot toward big blocking tight ends in this draft.     •    Luke: Explained the cyclical nature of NFL offense/defense evolution — as defenses get smaller to match spread offenses, teams counter with bigger personnel (12/13 formations), which then forces defenses to get bigger at the nickel/“big nickel” spot. Called it an ongoing arms race.
    • Dan Vladar is their best player and that is going to be the difference in the series 
×
×
  • Create New...