Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I left my guts in San Francisco


TNPanther

Recommended Posts

So apart from making fun of bandwagon 49ers fans, riding streetcars, and accidentally walking into gay bars, my visit to San Francisco has sucked.

Two nights ago I ate at a Chinese restaurant on Columbus Avenue called Hong Kong Suh. The food didn't taste too bad and the restaurant seemed legitimate.

However, I woke up the next morning and the first thing I did was puke into the kitchen sink. Since then I've been puking everywhere and feeling as if I was gonna die. I fought my illness to go see the Golden Gate Bridge and Muir Woods, only to projectile vomit off the bridge and almost resort to calling an ambulance because I felt so bad. I'm convinced I have food poisoning.

Today I feel much better but still a little bit nauseated. I haven't eaten anything besides a Chewy bar and a cookie in the past 48 hours. I can't fathom getting drunk tonight at all.

My question is...is it worth fighting my illness and potentially getting sicker to go party on New Year's in SF? Or should I stay in and just rest? I'm torn here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry you're entire impression of SF is being determined by a lousy Chinese restaurant. And accidentally backing walking into gay bars.... should have stayed out of the Castro District.

 

The Marina and Mission districts both have great places to eat. Damn, I feel bad for ya, it really is a great city. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...