Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Looking ahead: The Question of Dwan Edwards


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Say what you want, but Dwan Edwards has been an impact player since Rivera (yes, I said Rivera) brought him here. His contribution has been somewhat underrated and understated, especially here on the Huddle in my opinion. He brings that experienced veteran presence that frankly solidifies the line, and is the best insurance policy that the line is going to consistently do what it needs to do: get that push. I really appreciate what he's brought to the table.

 

All that being said, we have the young hog mollies in Short and Cole, and Edwards will be 33 next season provided that he wants to continue his career (which I assume that he does). I would think that he would especially want to continue to be a Panther, and should be comfortable with his role on the team. I just wonder whether or not he is going to want that much more money, and what the market is willing to bare for his services.  

 

In any event, his presence was sorely missed for a bit this year, and I suspect that he will be missed next year if his situation demands that he moves on.

 

Edit: Didn't know he signed a two-year deal.  I guess that answers it then. Now you can just show the man some appreciation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dwan Edwards still sidelined

Defensive tackle Dwan Edwards' quick start last season gave the Panthers' pass rush an early boost. But Edwards has been sidelined for three weeks this year with a hamstring injury that has hurt his quickness.

Edwards hasn't played since the Giants' game in Week 3 and looks like he'll be out again Sunday at Minnesota after missing the first two days of practice this week. The Panthers re-signed Edwards to a 2-year, $3.5 million deal after he recorded six sacks in 2012, the best total by a Panthers defensive tackle in 10 years.

http://blogs.charlotte.com/panthers/2013/10/dwan-edwards-still-sidelined.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can definitely see Edwards being a cap casualty. He's a good player no doubt but I'd rather keep Cole over him. With Alexander, Horton, and Hardy we have a lot rush packages to choose from without him.

 

 

This why we drafted a guy like Kawann Short. DG will run this like a business and if they feel KK can step in and fill the void they will pinch pennies wherever we can. As long as it helps the cap as oppose to hurt it I could see Dwan leaving.

 

 

Hardy, Mitchell, and Ginn are more important than him at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can definitely see Edwards being a cap casualty. He's a good player no doubt but I'd rather keep Cole over him. With Alexander, Horton, and Hardy we have a lot rush packages to choose from without him.

Cole gets absolutely no push as a pass-rusher. Players like Cole are replaceable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope Dwan Edwards wants to play for a few more years... even as a rotational guy he adds a lot to our defense, not just from a pass rushing perspective but a leadership perspective too. Having high-quality guys like him, Cole, Alexander, Horton, and Addison are what makes our line so great - there isn't a huge drop-off if someone needs a few plays out, and they won't just be dead weight out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cole gets absolutely no push as a pass-rusher. Players like Cole are replaceable.

 

Cole isn't here for pass rush. Cole is the only DT who can play Star's role and god forbid we see him go down. Cole is still very underrated in the league given his situation. It would be wise to hang onto him.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cole isn't here for pass rush. Cole is the only DT who can play Star's role and god forbid we see him go down. Cole is still very underrated in the league given his situation. It would be wise to hang onto him.

I've seen Short make more plays in the run game than Cole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to keep every one of our guys on the D-line.

 

Addison, Horton, Edwards, Lotu, Short, Hardy, CJ, Alexander, and I hope I didnt miss anybody.

 

Our rotation keeping those guys fresh is how we dominate the line of scrimage. This is without a doubt the number one factor in why we have won 12 games this year. Yes Thonas Davis and Keek and the DBs are a part of it too, but in almost all of our big games this year that had playoff potential... the determining factor was the big boys up front. 

 

 

I do admit that some of the guys in more of a 'back-up role' in he rotation are going to be lured away by other teams, but I do hope we can keep as many as we reasonably can and still be able to keep it going. It is our bread and butter, we wouldnt be winning wthout them.

 

Yeah, me too. I love the way Addison, Horton and, of course, Alexander, come off the bench and make plays. They appear well-coached, stoked, and ready to ball every time their number is called.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...