Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hardy contract and Johnson


Squirrel

Recommended Posts

I have always been a strong believer that you cant keep both after this year.  It would lock up to much cap space over the next couple of years.  But I did some research and I can see a way we can keep both atleast for next year.  IMO Hardy will be the better of the two going forward and if I had a choice would like to keep him long term.  Well there is a way. 

 

 

Johnsons contract is through to the 2016 season.  For 2014 Johnsons  cap figure will  be  16.4 million which is a lot and his dead money if he was cut is 16.2 so he wont be going anywhere next season.  But in 2015 is 17.4 his dead money 6 million. We could cut him or trade him and save 11.4 million in cap space.  So all we have to do for Hardy is figure a way to squeeze him n next season where we don't take a major cap hit. 

 

For Luke Beason is counting $8 million in cap money for 2014 so in 2015 we can just slide that to Luke so no issue there.  We could keep this defense next season if Hardy would work with us his first season.

 

The only question now is how we fit Cams contract in there too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was curious to know what dead money CJ would carry if being cut so thanks.

Also, like mentioned above CJ usually has the tougher match up. I've admitted to being on the sign Hardy bandwagon now after his recent performances. However, while CJ was out Hardy seemed to disappear. Hardy benefits greatly from the rest of the DL and CJ.

Hardy hasn't reached his ceiling yet and that's what is so intriguing about him. Gman has some tough decisions to make this offseason. One thing we can't afford, is to have Hardy walk away and get nothing in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was curious to know what dead money CJ would carry if being cut so thanks.

Also, like mentioned above CJ usually has the tougher match up. I've admitted to being on the sign Hardy bandwagon now after his recent performances. However, while CJ was out Hardy seemed to disappear. Hardy benefits greatly from the rest of the DL and CJ.

Hardy hasn't reached his ceiling yet and that's what is so intriguing about him. Gman has some tough decisions to make this offseason. One thing we can't afford, is to have Hardy walk away and get nothing in return.

Hardy plays RDE 80% of the time so he is taking on the better tackle the majority of the snaps.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say franchise Hardy this year and extend Cam. Then next year restructure CJ and then work on Hardy and Luke. The good part is that it would be another "contract year" for Hardy, not that I think it would make much difference with Kraken. 

 

The cap should jump a lot with the new TV contracts at that point.

 

Also, we have quite a bit of dead money that we will be rid of in the next year, so that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will all be done with Cam and Luke in mind. But knowing how DG values the DL I would expect Hardy to be retained. Somewhere along the line this offseason Godfrey will be cut. I also expect multiple players to make their giant contract more cap friendly. Stewart, Dwill, and TD will need to step up. I could see them doing something similar to what Gross did. It'd be nice if Johnson would take a cut as well in his base and instead take some bonus money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always been a strong believer that you cant keep both after this year.  It would lock up to much cap space over the next couple of years.  But I did some research and I can see a way we can keep both atleast for next year.  IMO Hardy will be the better of the two going forward and if I had a choice would like to keep him long term.  Well there is a way. 

 

 

Johnsons contract is through to the 2016 season.  For 2014 Johnsons  cap figure will  be  16.4 million which is a lot and his dead money if he was cut is 16.2 so he wont be going anywhere next season.  But in 2015 is 17.4 his dead money 6 million. We could cut him or trade him and save 11.4 million in cap space.  So all we have to do for Hardy is figure a way to squeeze him n next season where we don't take a major cap hit. 

 

For Luke Beason is counting $8 million in cap money for 2014 so in 2015 we can just slide that to Luke so no issue there.  We could keep this defense next season if Hardy would work with us his first season.

 

The only question now is how we fit Cams contract in there too. 

 

Charles Godfrey, Steve Smith (sorry but he isn't producing enough for the 7 mil I believe he's set to make next year, might retire too), Gross (might retire) and our running backs.  All that rolled up should be enough even if Cam's demands are absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It wasn’t completely his fault, but outside of two throws and one or two scrambles he didn’t do much to help. His accuracy was all over the place, numerous passes that were placed poorly and didn’t give the receiver a good chance to catch the ball or do anything with it after. He also continues to display terrible pocket awareness. Even the sacks could have been avoided, they weren’t immediate like the pressure we got on Shough at times. Bryce just often has no feel for pressure and stands there waiting to get sacked after numerous seconds have passed. 
    • I really fuging hate this era in so many ways.  I look at those Adin Ross and Neon kids, and I just wonder why tf are they famous?  Why would anyone be desperate enough to gain THAT audience that they’d risk money, career, disciplinary action to go up there and associate with those fuging dweebs?  And back in my day, racist peers got their ass beat.  And not endorsing or approving bully culture, but checks and balances and all…  had those two been bullied, or at the very least humbled, they wouldn’t be famous and glorified for being the fuging idiots they are now.  It seriously pisses me off… they both have done and said multiple, openly racist stuff and major media keeps pushing them, talking about them, and propping them up… and then dummies like Puka who don’t need the platform or exposure lend their celebrity to them.  fuging idiot… and even the other streamers, I don’t get - Speed, Kai…  I don’t understand making nobodies famous at all, but there is at least entertainment value to some degree there, and I could see how young, impressionable kids would find them something to aspire to (sadly), or view as “cool.”  But Ross and Neon?  They’re just shitty, shitty nerds with big ass mouths. I’ve went back recently and watched some classics (in two very different eras and categories 😂)  like Robocop and Idiocracy.  And what I find fascinating is how both movies illustrate how stupid society became by showing what the citizenry is entertained by.  In both, society became anti-intellectual and the citizenry were entertained by lowest denominator, primal-type absurdity - poo like, “Ouch! My Balls!”  Or on Robocop, a guy is a watching a show where they are smashing cakes on ladies’ breasts and then a guy says a line as the camera zooms in like, “I’d buy that for a dollar!” and the audience thinks it’s hilarious.  That’s where I feel like we are now.  Like who watches that clip with Puka and thinks any of that poo is funny or cool?  If I was Puka, I’d honestly be wondering why tf I’m hanging out with these beta ass, racist, cretin ass weirdos.
    • 7 wins this year and some of those against really good teams and yall think Canales might get fired? Lol Good luck getting a better coach in here if that happens.  
×
×
  • Create New...