Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chiefs/Colts Game Thread

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

mcdougal Newbie

mcdougal

Posted
Posted

It's pretty sad, actually.  Had we been down like this, and Cam would've thrown 2 picks, you would've had people on here saying to bench him.  There was one poster on here who said we should bench him for the Saints game a year ago.  Shoot, they were saying that for both Saints games this year.

 

Hell, per some here, Cam would get bench for throwing an in-completion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rko396 Newbie

rko396

Posted
Posted

so what you're saying is that Luck wasn't capable of finding a way to get the team back into it, and instead needed someone else to spark his teammates?

Yes. Im saying Luck couldn't keep pace with a team that was on pace to score 62 points. He must suck right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Pox 08 Newbie

Pox 08

Posted
Posted

Some of you guys are getting too defensive about Luck.

 

Seriously. 

 

 

 

If it was Romo, Cutler,   Rivers,  or basically any other qb,  most would still be talking trash about them.            Our fans even talk smack about Cam after two int games...    so why would Luck get special treatment here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KendrickPanther Apprentice

KendrickPanther

Posted
Posted

This shouldn't have started at all. The QBs in this game are Andrew Luck and Alex Smith. But the goon squad patrols these forums picking fights over Cam every chance they get. Cam isn't even playing this weekend. I'm not an Andrew Luck fan, but I am a fan of common sense. I am a fan of maturity. I don't see it from the Luck haters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
theyhateme45 Newbie

theyhateme45

Posted
Posted

so what you're saying is that Luck wasn't capable of finding a way to get the team back into it, and instead needed someone else to spark his teammates?

 

"Wow!  Luck finally stops throwing an INT and his teammates help him out with some nice catches and now they're back into it!  Who woulda thunk it?"

 

Sometimes teams need some big momentum shift to get things rolling on the right tracks... 

 

So yes sometimes teams, players need a spark to get things going. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Swan Newbie

Swan

Posted
Posted

Would you like him to play middle line backer and shut down alex smith as well? Dont cry to hard. Cam will hopefully get to Lucks level soon

 

As I was typing my reply, Luck decides to throw for another TD. Good for him and the Colts.

 

So your only "rational" (not useless insults/garbage) statement here is:

 

"Cam will hopefully get to Lucks level soon."

 

Please, expand upon that. I want to hear your expert knowledge on quarterbacks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • NCBlu
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By NCBlu · Posted

      Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • Soul Rebel
      2026 Mock Drafts

      By Soul Rebel · Posted

      I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • rebelrouser
      Thoughts on using AI for drafting?

      By rebelrouser · Posted

      Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...