Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

IT ALL BOILS DOWN TO SHULA


Recommended Posts

The defense will do their part in keeping us in the game.  I have no doubt about it.  They might even score a TD or set us up for a quick score. 

 

I think the players will be motivated and focused and execute the plays called.

 

Shula has 17 weeks of film and one of those was a head to head match up.  Shula has to have a good game plan from the opening whistle.   There shouldn't be any excuse for a solid game plan.

 

We have the players, we have the defense.   Shula needs to be his "A" GAME on Sunday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game boils down to a hell of a lot more than just Shula. Our Run D has been porous the last couple weeks- Gore is coming to town. Last time we didn't face David much or Crabtree at all. Aldon Smith was in a limited role, Cam's passes were off, OL couldn't create lanes; O only scored 10.

It comes down to winning the one on one battles, the execution and like my title says it comes down to controlling the LOS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This game boils down to a hell of a lot more than just Shula. Our Run D has been porous the last couple weeks- Gore is coming to town. Last time we didn't face David much or Crabtree at all. Aldon Smith was in a limited role, Cam's passes were off, OL couldn't create lanes; O only scored 10.

It comes down to winning the one on one battles, the execution and like my title says it comes down to controlling the LOS.

 

As I said in the opening post.  I believe the defense will show up and I hope execution will be good.  Our defense isn't so much a worry for me as our offense is.

 

We have squeaked wins against NYJ, NO and Atl with all three games won by the defense.  Our offense has looked stagnant for long stretches in the game. 

 

With every defense there is a way to attack it.  I don't think Shula does a good enough job at finding those weaknesses a defense has.   Green Bay notched 20 points against SF in the second coldest game in history or something like that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

idk how this is on shula, as long as the play calling isn't like at the end of the falcons game we should be find as long as guys get there job done.

 

its out of our hands we have to trust our guys know how important this game is and that they will be prepare for it, and they have proven time after time they have been ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...