Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tag Da Kraken

chknwing

By chknwing,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

chknwing Veteran

chknwing

Posted
Posted

Some have said sign him long term, some have said let him go as he will demand a contract that will cripple the team.  Was this the peak of his career, most certainly was his best year.  There is no doubt in my mind, that Hardy will remember what this loss feels like and it will consume him.  He will destroy people next year.  12-4 was fun, 16-0 is gonna be sweet.

 

py9Eu.St.138.jpeg

IJtrt.St.138.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

Our stable of RB's are going to prevent us from doing a lot of things.

 

Tag and trade maybe?  Love to have him, but signing him means very little else in FA.  Means we only have the draft to get WR's, OL, and CB's.

 

Means further that Ginn, Mitchell, etc will get no raise?

 

Not arguing that we'd like to have him, just that $$$ might prevent us from doing a lot of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jptaylor84 Newbie

jptaylor84

Posted
Posted

Tag and trade imo. Yes he's solid but seven sacks came in the last two games mainly against a banged up atlanta oline. What I seem out of Addison and Alexander we got enough to replace him until we can address replacing him full time, there just to many holes on this team to justify giving him the money.

Our db corps is prob worst in the league and our offence is just pathetic, if we don't want to ever see the best of cam newton in Charlotte then trade the guy now, he needs a line and weapons if this isn't priority over hardy and stocking the defence up then as I said we may aswel let cam go! Were a defensive built first team and I'm sick of the Oline/Offense going without all the time

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chknwing Veteran

chknwing

Posted
  • Author
Posted

tagging Kraken, trading 1/2 of double trouble will allow carolina to address the offense.  getting a 3rd for either deangelo or stewart would be great.  And drafting at 28th, I say trade down in to round 2 picking up an extra 3rd.  Now you have 2x2's and 3x3's to load up on OL/CB.  WR is best addressed through free agency.  The ciritical part is wtf to do with Shula.  Just dont know whose out there thats available that would be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jptaylor84 Newbie

jptaylor84

Posted
Posted

tagging Kraken, trading 1/2 of double trouble will allow carolina to address the offense. getting a 3rd for either deangelo or stewart would be great. And drafting at 28th, I say trade down in to round 2 picking up an extra 3rd. Now you have 2x2's and 3x3's to load up on OL/CB. WR is best addressed through free agency. The ciritical part is wtf to do with Shula. Just dont know whose out there thats available that would be better.

Nobody in there right mind would take Stewart for a third rounder he's just too injury prone to take a chance on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lemory Community Regular

Lemory

Posted
Posted

tagging Kraken, trading 1/2 of double trouble will allow carolina to address the offense. getting a 3rd for either deangelo or stewart would be great.

A 3rd for either of them is a little steep. One's a pro bike rider and the other is aging.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Doyle Collaborator

Doyle

Posted
Posted

tagging Kraken, trading 1/2 of double trouble will allow carolina to address the offense.  getting a 3rd for either deangelo or stewart would be great.  And drafting at 28th, I say trade down in to round 2 picking up an extra 3rd.  Now you have 2x2's and 3x3's to load up on OL/CB.  WR is best addressed through free agency.  The ciritical part is wtf to do with Shula.  Just dont know whose out there thats available that would be better.

 

I really don't think we could get a 3rd for either one of them.  I would be shocked if we did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

Nobody will give ANYTHING for DWill or Stewart.  We cannot give them away because of their contracts.  No team in their right mind would take on those salaries, much less give up draft picks to do it.

 

 

Let's explore the Tag situation.  Don't think we will get 2 firsts, but tagging might get us one first in a trade

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • PNW_PantherMan
      Off Season Thread

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • PanthersNCSU
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By PanthersNCSU · Posted

      The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • TD alt
      Barnwell - Ranking WR, TE, RB Groups in NFL

      By TD alt · Posted

      Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...