Kraken Compensation

[Growl]

Well, what do you think?

I believe a tag and trade nets us a 2nd, which would be incredibly useful in a deep draft year.

Letting him walk likely nets us a 3rd next year.

[MichaelNewtonII]

At least a 2nd, some are saying we could score the raiders 1st, or get two 2nd rounders. either way im good as long as we are compensated for him leaving.

[IamSoClutch]

as long as we don't get nothing at all

[Pejorative Miscreant]

Well, what do you think?

I believe a tag and trade nets us a 2nd, which would be incredibly useful in a deep draft year.

 

 

Just need a dance partner. 

 

[chknwing]

we get 2 firsts. bottom line.

[h0llywood]

If Trent Richardson can net you a 1st....

[Growl]

we get 2 firsts. bottom line.

Even if that wasn't ridiculous, we don't weild that kind of leverage with teams knowing we have to get rid of him.

[chknwing]

Even if that wasn't ridiculous, we don't weild that kind of leverage with teams knowing we have to get rid of him.

 

its not ridiculous. its fact

 

Non-Exclusive Tag

Using the non-exclusive tag on a player gives teams a certain amount of security. Other teams can work to sign a player to a long-term contract, and the team that tags the player can either match that deal or receive two first-round picks in compensation for its loss.

[Growl]

If Trent Richardson can net you a 1st....

I suppose there's merit to this, but Richardson looked a lot better at the time of his trade.

Not to mention it was midseason and Indy was looking for something to push them over the top.

[h0llywood]

I suppose there's merit to this, but Richardson looked a lot better at the time of his trade.

Not to mention it was midseason and Indy was looking for something to push them over the top.

 

If there is a team that will gamble on a second year player who can't run past the line of scrimmage, i'm certain there are teams that will look to take a proven commodity and pro-bowler that can play any position on the line. 

[Growl]

its not ridiculous. its fact

Non-Exclusive Tag

Using the non-exclusive tag on a player gives teams a certain amount of security. Other teams can work to sign a player to a long-term contract, and the team that tags the player can either match that deal or receive two first-round picks in compensation for its loss.

This is for RFA's. I'm talking about a franchise tag and trade. Hardy is unrestricted I do believe.

[chknwing]

This is for RFA's. I'm talking about a franchise tag and trade. Hardy is unrestricted I do believe.

 

hes neither if we tag him. thats what the tag is for. Carolina can choose to match an offer or get 2 first round picks.  There is nothing in between.

[chknwing]

and ultimately, what this will do is scare teams away from talking to hardy as 2 first round picks will make it difficult.  Thus giving Gettlemen more leverage to work out a fair deal with Hardy.

[Growl]

hes neither if we tag him. thats what the tag is for. Carolina can choose to match an offer or get 2 first round picks. There is nothing in between.

yeah I'm pretty sure it doesnt work this way. i believe the franchise tag only places him under contract for year-as a normal regular player- getting paids the average of top 5 money at his position- and gives the team the freedome to do what they wish for him and trade him for whatever they see fit.

youre thinking of tenders.