Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2014 Razzie noms

Jangler

By Jangler,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

Jangler Newbie

Jangler

Posted
Posted

Worst movie:

After Earth

Grown-Ups 2

The Lone Ranger

A Madea Christmas

Movie 43

 

Worst actor:

Johnny Depp, The Lone Ranger

Ashton Kutcher, Jobs

Adam Sandler, Grown Ups 2

Jaden Smith, After Earth

Sylvester Stallone, Bullet To The Head, Escape Plan and Grudge Match

 

Worst actress:

Halle Berry, The Call and Movie 43

Selena Gomez, Getaway

Lindsay Lohan, The Canyons

Tyler Perry, A Madea Christmas

Naomi Watts, Diana and Movie 43

 

Worst supporting actress:

Lady Gaga, Machete Kills

Salma Hayek, Grown Ups 2

Katherine Heigl, The Big Wedding

Kim Kardashian, Tyler Perry's Temptation

Lindsay Lohan, In-App-Propriate Comedy and Scary Movie 5

 

Worst supporting actor:

Chris Brown, Battle of the Year

Larry the Cable Guy, A Madea Christmas

Taylor Lautner, Grown Ups 

Nick Swardson, A Haunted House and Grown Ups 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites
cultclassiccat Newbie

cultclassiccat

Posted
Posted

Saw the lone ranger again on an outdoor projector screen and it's still incredible

Still one of the best films of the year, actual film aficianados like Tarantino agree

agreed.

 

dont understand the hate.  soundtrack and cinematography are pretty good imo.  johnny d is funny and entertaining the whole way through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
j2sgam Collaborator

j2sgam

Posted
Posted

I liked the Lone Ranger, dont know what people were expecting... Its Depp playing an off-the-wall character (go figure) and its based on a TV show from way back. Who was expecting the next  Argo/Crash/Ghandi? The same people that bitched about Transformers... Lone Ranger is entertaining, I like the fact that they went the 'origin' route, give you the backstory...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

I simply do not understand the Tyler Perry franchise at all. Why does this guy have to be a woman in his movies? Is he that bad of an actor that he needs to be an even worse actress? Makes no sense to me at all. 

 

Aside from that, I've not seen nor will I see any of these....

 

Say what you will; Tyler Perry knows his audience and knows how to make a movie that appeals to them.

 

Go to Box Office Mojo and check out his oeuvre. He just prints money every time he makes a movie. It doesn't seem to matter what it's about, if it's good or not, anything really. If he makes a movie, he's going to triple the dollars spent to make it. Low budget, high profit, reliable as clockwork: The Tyler Perry Franchise Explained.

 

All I know is I'd never go see any of his crappy movies. But I'll tip my hat to him as a businessman.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted

Say what you will; Tyler Perry knows his audience and knows how to make a movie that appeals to them.

 

Go to Box Office Mojo and check out his oeuvre. He just prints money every time he makes a movie. It doesn't seem to matter what it's about, if it's good or not, anything really. If he makes a movie, he's going to triple the dollars spent to make it. Low budget, high profit, reliable as clockwork: The Tyler Perry Franchise Explained.

 

All I know is I'd never go see any of his crappy movies. But I'll tip my hat to him as a businessman.

 

 

In other words, he has sacrificed every ounce of integrity, image, legitimacy as an actor, credibility in his craft for money.

 

When his run is over, no one will remember him and no one will miss him.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Captroop Grand Master

Captroop

Posted
Posted

In other words, he has sacrificed every ounce of integrity, image, legitimacy as an actor, credibility in his craft for money.

 

When his run is over, no one will remember him and no one will miss him.

 

 

Nope. Not a soul will miss him. He'll just sit in his enormous mansion overlooking the Pacific Ocean, and cry into his chalice of Dom Perignon, pining over his lost integrity as an actor.

 

What a fool. 

 

Some people act because it's a craft they take seriously, and they want to be remembered as one of the great artists who truly advanced the medium; the Tom Hankses, the Kevin Spaceys, the Denzels, the Jacks, the Blanchetts. Others just want to entertain; the Sandlers, the Stillers, the Schwarzeneggers, the Harts, the Carrey's, the Depps. And there are those who just look at movies as a means to make boatloads of money. You can't fault a man for that.

 

Also, before you think that other actors aren't just as willing to sell their acting integrity down the river for a big check, look at the ads and B-movies they are making overseas and, praying they never make their way back to the US.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • TD alt
      Draft intel from ESPN’s Jordan Reid

      By TD alt · Posted

      Oh, now we are "top half?" Keep moving the goal posts. No we aren't. We don't have a surefire WR2, nor do we have a TE that we can count on to consistently make big plays. Our receiving corps is somewhat bland to be honest. It does not have enough juice. Add another playmaker, then we'll likely be top half. Our receiving corps ranked somewhere between 20 and 25 in the league depending upon who you look at. No one has us in the top half based upon last season.
    • MHS831
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      It is hard to say--if you look back at our roster from 4 years ago...In addition, we have a ton of money going into our OL right now (which might strengthen the argument to draft a tackle now)  The average NFL career is under 4 years, but the average NFL career for first rounders is 9.3 years, so most get 2 contracts.   So having said that, I look at it as capital--if your concern (legit) becomes an issue, then you should have the same vision and trade that player and draft his replacement.  However, TMAC, Coker, and a rookie is not likely to be a problem for another 4 years--2030.   But to your point, we have a situation right now that the OL has 2 guards and a RT around or over 30.  The make about $70m per year.   I like the perspective of reality you bring, however.  Is that a factor to morgan in 2026?  
    • tukafan21
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I have no problem drafting a WR, even as high as the 2nd, but I do have an issue with using a precious 1st rounder on it. Another WR is a need, but we also have a lot of other needs, and the goal should always be to draft 1st rounders that you expect to be on the team for 10 years if they stay healthy. In regards to Coker, one of two things happen.  He keeps getting better and becomes our legit #2 to T-Mac and we have to pay him accordingly, or he doesn’t. If he does, then using that 1st rounder on a WR this year was dumb.  If he doesn’t, then drafting a WR in the 1st this year would be smart, but then so would trading Coker when his perceived value would be at its highest. If we were already had a SB contending roster, then yes, a 1st Round WR to put us over the top makes sense, but we just have too many holes to fill to use it that way… again, unless the staff just doesn’t believe in Coker’s ability to become a true #2, which I think he really can be.
×
×
  • Create New...