Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Super Bowl XLVIII: Date subject to change

jasonluckydog

By jasonluckydog,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

stirs Grand Master

stirs

Posted
Posted

As 10 day forecasts now get to Sunday, it looks like game time temps will be around 30 with a 30% chance of snow showers.

 

Doe not look like a bid deal to me.  Play the game, a little snow will enhance the viewing.  It's not like it is gonna be 4 degrees or anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MtnProwler Rookie

MtnProwler

Posted
Posted

I love the intrigue that a Super Bowl in New Jersey has. Another element is added, and that an element most teams deal with week in and week out during the season. It's only fair to the spirit of football that the final game be subject to the same external factors.

Are you talking about regular season games that brings in a fraction of viewers, endorsements, commercials, and publicity? That contains many games across 3 different days, in many different time zones, and across many regions? That's no way similar to The SuperBowl being one game, one time, one region. Weather probably won't be a problem with this one, but I hate the idea that the NFL actually expects us to now set aside a 3 day window for the single most important game of the year. It's hard enough to get people all together for one day of the year for a party/holiday. I am completely against this becoming the standard of The Super Bowl. Don't change it if it's not broken, continue to have the game in warmer climates or at least indoors where the weather is less volatile this time of year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPcavedweller Grand Master

CPcavedweller

Posted
Posted

Are you talking about regular season games that brings in a fraction of viewers, endorsements, commercials, and publicity? That contains many games across 3 different days, in many different time zones, and across many regions? That's no way similar to The SuperBowl being one game, one time, one region. Weather probably won't be a problem with this one, but I hate the idea that the NFL actually expects us to now set aside a 3 day window for the single most important game of the year. It's hard enough to get people all together for one day of the year for a party/holiday. I am completely against this becoming the standard of The Super Bowl. Don't change it if it's not broken, continue to have the game in warmer climates or at least indoors where the weather is less volatile this time of year.

The intrigue I mentioned is not the 3 day contingency plan. I'd like to keep it at a set date. The intrigue lies in knowing that the game may not be a clear, 75 degree night in FEBRUARY. I like the idea that Mother Nature gets her shot because that's how the games are played all year long.

I am disturbed by a contingency plan simply because at what point is the weather too bad to play? What temperature is too cold? If Green Bay is in the Super Bowl, how could 0 degrees be too cold when they played a playoff game at 0.

Play the ball as it lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DecrypticShadow Newbie

DecrypticShadow

Posted
Posted

I am hoping it snows during the Superbowl. It would be nice to see the Superbowl played in the elements of the season for the first time in a long time. Usually the Superbowl is booked to be played in a dome somewhere, Florida, or San Diego.

 

Forecast is still calling for 30% chance of snow on Superbowl Sunday, yet the high temperature forecast has it being the "warmest" day in the past 10 days at 36 degrees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

It's not a matter of playing in the elements, as football should be, or beating your chest to show how tuff you are. The important fact here is weather controls everything and we control none of it, mainly travel. With the Super Bowls, scheduling matters soooo much for ticket sales and prime air time, you could be faced with playing a Super Bowl with 1/4 of the attendance because of plane delays or be forced to move it to accommodate all those who bought tickets. Either of the two would be horrible for the game. As CC eluded to, is the NFL so arrogant to think it has tens of millions of Americans on standby for a window of 3 full days?!

They had a Super Bowl in Detroit in January a few years back and it snowed plenty. There weren't any issues. Cold weather cities know how to deal with snow.

On the flipside, the Super Bowl they held in sunny Jacksonville was a disaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hawk Newbie

Hawk

Posted
Posted

I hope it's cold and windy....with maybe just a little snow...that part I don't care about.

 

 

it would be a fuggen disgrace if they move it...they had to know this was a real possibility when they choose Jersey in the first place!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MtnProwler Rookie

MtnProwler

Posted
Posted

They had a Super Bowl in Detroit in January a few years back and it snowed plenty. There weren't any issues. Cold weather cities know how to deal with snow.

On the flipside, the Super Bowl they held in sunny Jacksonville was a disaster.

Then why do they need a contingency plan?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Gronk is the best TE of all time, but he also played with Brady. Clarke was great, but had Peyton and in an era TE's didn't make crazy money. Kittle is great, but the two times he's made the SB, he was still on his rookie contract for one, and the other the 49ers had Purdy on a cheap rookie deal which help them build the rest of the roster. So again, it's not about not wanting an elite TE, of course it would be nice.  But realistically, in today's NFL, unless that elite TE with a top end TE salary is on a team with a GOAT level QB and/or other serious cap savings (i.e. key players on rookie deals), then I think it's not a good use of cap space.  
    • Sean Payton's Vicodin
      The Carolina Huddle

      By Sean Payton's Vicodin · Posted

      This place was the poo pre tepper with tons of hilarious posters like phillyB. Joined in the 2000s during the 07 season and have been here bitching about this team since. but yeah its sadly been dying a slow death, every time I come to this site I am surprised its still up. I think the 2015 season was the absolute peak, the Panthers and this board especially just haven't "felt" the same since then. Igo should really sell the board since he clearly doesn't care anymore. Also, Reddit blows and the Bryce defenders on there need Jesus.
    • Jacabee
      Time to Sign David Njoku

      By Jacabee · Posted

      Guessing the price is too rich here given the injury history.  2024 was brutal and production dropped off in 2025 with a few more injuries (albeit rough qb play).    Don’t really understand the narrative that Young can’t benefit from talented upgrades on offense. Especially here with respect to a tight end. Any QB will benefit from talented receivers that threaten the top of coverage and tight ends with skills to stress zone.    The age and injury history, coupled with what he’s likely asking, just probably means we can better spend that money elsewhere.
×
×
  • Create New...