Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has anyone seen and watched Enders Game?


intangiblejohnny

Recommended Posts

The movie was too fast. It was paced like they were running out of clock... Effects were great, acting was better than most scifi acting. But the story was just too rushed.

The book was good. You don't get the same feelings out of the film.

Sent from my VS980 4G using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We saw it - I'd never read the books and I liked it.  My 13 year old daughter had and she was disappointed that there were huge chunks left out or changed for the movie.  That still didn't stop her from enjoying the movie though.  I asked her to tell me about the differences and they did seem significant, but the movie would have needed another hour to tell the story like the book.  We actually went back to see it a second time because my husband couldn't go the first time and I thought he'd enjoy it.  May I also say that I saw it at the dollar theater.  I wouldn't have gone back to see it a second time at full price.  I'll probably buy the DVD because I think it's enjoyable enough to be in the family movie night rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was really hoping the movie would have stuck to the primary themes of the book.

GTG- I would highly recommend reading the book. It's a quick read and very powerful. Somehow it manages to be philosophical and violent, complex and romantic while still appealing to all age groups.

I read it for the first time when I was sixteen and I enjoy it just as much now that I'm in my 30's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like all good SciFi novels that get translated to movie scripts there is so much of the story that never makes it to the screen. 

 

If your looking for the depth and complexity of the novel then dont bother.  If you want a pretty good SciFi flick and can look past whats not there or dont know what you're missing then is definitely worth a watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like all good SciFi novels that get translated to movie scripts there is so much of the story that never makes it to the screen.

If your looking for the depth and complexity of the novel then dont bother. If you want a pretty good SciFi flick and can look past whats not there or dont know what you're missing then is definitely worth a watch.

Exactly the answer was I was looking for. Thanks, man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched it last night and I thought they did a pretty good job considering the limitations of a film being able to describe a book of that scope.

Most of the important themes were present and adequetely executed.

I think it would be a rough movie to watch if you hadn't read the book.

My complaints: (like anyone cares)

1. Ender wasn't portrayed as cold or damaged enough.

2. Peter was portrayed as the psychopath he was in the book.

3. No Locke and Demonthes take over the world subplot.

4. Didn't properly display the level of Ender's or Bean's genius.

5. A bunch of other poo now that I really start to think about it....

That being said, there is no a way a movie can measure up to a book a person has loved since adolescence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
×
×
  • Create New...