Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Spirit Airline: You get what you pay for / Never fly Spirit


SOJA

Recommended Posts

I'm here today to tell you all why you should never book a flight on Spirit Airline.

 

Spirit is known for having cheap, affordable flights- similar to Ryan Air for those of you across the pond. They also have cheap and terrible customer service.

 

After spending an hour on the phone with them today to simply change a low cost flight ($35) to a few days later, I was told it would cost be $120. Any flight change made outside of 24 hours of booking costs this. Now, if I booked a completely new flight it would still only cost me $35. Thus, I was advised by a supervisor to book a new flight or cancel my old. So now I have one completely useless ticket that is completely non-refundable

 

On top of this, you are allowed one personal item, but a carry on will cost you another $100.

 

This is how they nab you, they basically expect you to show up with minimal items and make absolutely no changes in your work/social life and then, only then, in this utopian vision they have- will you be guaranteed your low cost flight.

 

Thus we see what you get when you buy cheap things. With all the feel good customer service stories I see on the internet, this is exactly the opposite. I realize this is only $35 dollars, but the money is not the real issue here. It's the inflexibility and overall unresponsiveness I received. In my years of traveling I've had poor experiences with other Airlines, but they have always been willing to refund or give future flights in exchange. Spirit not only didn't offer anything, they patronized me saying they had already explained their policies to me.

 

I have never felt more alienated by a company over what would seemingly be a very easy change.

 

In your future, if you have the option of flying either Spirit Airline or any other airline, choose the other airline. God forbid life would happen and you would need to make a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it makes you feel any better I had to eat a round trip $180 ticket to New York because of Hurricane Sandy in 2012.

 

 

Every airline I know of is that way about changes unless you pay extra for insurance.

 

 

true and I'm sorry about that. I want to reiterate that my issue isn't the money its the horrible customer service and the inflexible system they have in place. This is more of a warning to not use Spirit unless you absolutely have to

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I flew Vanguard one time out of Myrtle Beach. They either purchased Hooters Air or Hooters Air purchased them. Anyway, it was an old ass B737 and I had the bulkhead seat up front (minus the bulkhead). When it was time to depart, the flight attendant asked me to get up and help her shut the door because it had to be slammed hard to engage. After doing that I never flew them again and I think they went bankrupt a year later.

But yes, Spirit sucks ass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Spirit to fly from Myrtle Beach to Atlantic City once in awhile. I know you mention it's not about the money but that seems to be your gripe (won't change their policy to give your money back) and there are some things to point out.

 

You can check a bag for $30 or $35 not $100. The $100 is only if you check the bag at the gate. This is to deter people from getting around paying for a bag buy checking it only when they "accidently" realize that it is too big to fit under the seat.

The $120 to change a flight is cheaper than most other US airlines. Sure it's cheaper to just cancel it and re-book it as you said though.

 

Almost half of Spirits revenue is made up by fees and non ticket revenue and that is how they can be profitable and still sell round trip flights for $25. They are stingent on their rules to protect their profits. It's not like they try to hide any of the charges that you will pay if you need to make changes.

 

You get what you pay for but when I can easily fly to Atlantic City and back for well under $50 roundtrip, I am not going to expect world class service and I realize the risk I am taking if I need to make changes or cancel, but that risk is only the $50 ticket I bought.

 

Damn, I just realized I sound like a Spirit airline spokesman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Spirit to fly from Myrtle Beach to Atlantic City once in awhile. I know you mention it's not about the money but that seems to be your gripe (won't change their policy to give your money back) and there are some things to point out.

 

You can check a bag for $30 or $35 not $100. The $100 is only if you check the bag at the gate. This is to deter people from getting around paying for a bag buy checking it only when they "accidently" realize that it is too big to fit under the seat.

The $120 to change a flight is cheaper than most other US airlines. Sure it's cheaper to just cancel it and re-book it as you said though.

 

Almost half of Spirits revenue is made up by fees and non ticket revenue and that is how they can be profitable and still sell round trip flights for $25. They are stingent on their rules to protect their profits. It's not like they try to hide any of the charges that you will pay if you need to make changes.

 

You get what you pay for but when I can easily fly to Atlantic City and back for well under $50 roundtrip, I am not going to expect world class service and I realize the risk I am taking if I need to make changes or cancel, but that risk is only the $50 ticket I bought.

 

Damn, I just realized I sound like a Spirit airline spokesman.

 

 

 

true and I understand your point completely, it's always good to have a devil's advocate 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Spirit to fly from Myrtle Beach to Atlantic City once in awhile. I know you mention it's not about the money but that seems to be your gripe (won't change their policy to give your money back) and there are some things to point out.

You can check a bag for $30 or $35 not $100. The $100 is only if you check the bag at the gate. This is to deter people from getting around paying for a bag buy checking it only when they "accidently" realize that it is too big to fit under the seat.

The $120 to change a flight is cheaper than most other US airlines. Sure it's cheaper to just cancel it and re-book it as you said though.

Almost half of Spirits revenue is made up by fees and non ticket revenue and that is how they can be profitable and still sell round trip flights for $25. They are stingent on their rules to protect their profits. It's not like they try to hide any of the charges that you will pay if you need to make changes.

You get what you pay for but when I can easily fly to Atlantic City and back for well under $50 roundtrip, I am not going to expect world class service and I realize the risk I am taking if I need to make changes or cancel, but that risk is only the $50 ticket I bought.

Damn, I just realized I sound like a Spirit airline spokesman.

Yeah I went to their website and it actually sounds kind of awesome.

If only they had flights out of Charlotte or Greensboro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Falcons win was a fantastic way to end the season and I think just about every Panthers fan would agree the team the coaching staff and particularly Bryce Young were impressive. We really needed that. Credit where it's due. At the same time. Now we have to establish it wasn't just a flash in the pan. We had one of those earlier in the season against the Raiders. As a tortured Panthers fan I have to acknowledge that. I know you're joking but in all seriousness I don't think the QB sneak is something for us to be concerned about in general but I would be lying to myself if I did not acknowledge that looking back at one particular game last season where we continually trotted out Eddie Pinero on 4th and short on the opponents side of the field we could use some creativity in those situations and it's also a matter of predictability. As time goes on it's something for Canales to work on and figure out. Especially with our kicker situation as it stands.
    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
    • I honestly can't stand the knee jerk emotional fans on both sides be they critical or homers, very much a wait and see try to remain objective as long as possible type fan.
×
×
  • Create New...