Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I think that we can all agree on JC and JJ, but what about JF as another target for Cam?


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I think that we can all agree that we'd be pleased, if not downright relieved, if Gettleman could somehow work his magic on Jesus C---pardon me---Jerricho Cotchery and James Jones in particular.  They would be solid signings, if not downright spectacular if Gettleman could somehow squeeze in Jermichael Finley into the fold.  We're still dealing with little money, but I would hope that the lure of Cam and a possible longer term future with a championship contender would make Finley chill on his seemingly prima-donna-like ways and consider following his ex-teammate (provided we can even get that done).  The Seahawks had been showing Finley interest, and still may be, but they just re-upped Zach Miller.

 

That would be a nice trifecta of sorts with as little money as we're dealing with this off-season. And it would make G-man look like a motherfuging boss, even if we did all know it was by luck and default.

 

 

What do you say? That's me, always trying to think outside the box.  Nice trifecta, indeed. That, or call the Raiders about that 5th round pick for Denarius Moore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought you meant Jacoby Ford, who could effectively replace Ginn. 

 

Well, admittedly that's probably more likely.  I'd rather have Finley's services though...I think. The pass catching TE would probably provide a better target for Cam, particularly with how Shula wants to call games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jason Avant....mr reliable will be in the mix I'm sure

 

I see Cotchery and Avant filling the same purpose, so it would surprise me if we sign both. Cotchery is obviously the first choice. He would make for a fine stop-gap WR3 with possible WR2 upside. I kind of see King playing that same type of WR3 role, but who knows.  Avant, due to his lack of YAC is probably only a WR3 at best. And I doubt that Shula's play calling wouldn't bring out his best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...