Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Knox Bardeen's 7 Round Mock for the Panthers (BR Article)


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

Round 1 Morgan Moses OT Virginia

hi-res-d0ebf8113acd170b1ed1d2940218377a_

Round 2 Paul Richardson WR Colorado

 Paul+Richardson+Colorado+v+Colorado+Stat

Round 3 CB Stanley Jean-Baptiste Nebraska

ncf_u_baptiste_kh_600x400.jpg

Round 4 OT Cameron Fleming Stanford

hi-res-d00de37161cde25621959ddbfc15de29_

Round 5 Dontae Johnson FS/CB NC State

hi-res-602d2e5c4e716fa2747127039bbea5a1_

Round 6 Chris Watt OG Notre Dame

hi-res-02998e1aeabd1e7c761ef5677df56548_

Round 7 WR Michael Campanero Wake Forest

hi-res-53cc2793ee109dfd242ab9908b0df2e4_

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2017082-complete-panthers-7-round-mock-draft-for-2014

 

Not a bad 7 round mock.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at 28, we are honestly looking at 2nd round talent at that point, no way around it. people thinking we will be getting someone along the lines of Sammy watkins are sadly mistaken. This is the most likely outcome of any draft, and it isn't god awful. 

 

Maybe if you're hellbent on WR or OT. If you're just drafting the BPA then no, we won't have to settle for a second round player. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not bad. We almost have to take Moses if he's there in the 1st. I've seen plenty of mocks with him going to the top ten of the 2nd so we might as well

I said the same thing.  I thought it was one of the best 7 round Mocks I've seen so far.  SJB would start at Nickel immediately.  Camp would be a solid slot receiver and we would finally add depth to our OL.  Lastly, if Fleming could come in and show out in camp we WOULDN'T have to worry about Bell.  Which is always a plus.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we're drafting that many secondary players and I'm not a big fan of frail Paul Richardson.

I like the Oline pick but do we really need 3 of them??

I would truly hate if we came out of this draft with Paul Richardson and the wake kid as the only weapons we add to our WR corp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...