Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

kiper doesn't think panthers should take tackle at 28


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

My philosophy is stick with what you have thought from the start. If you liked a player originally from watching his games don't make rash decisions to move someone else over him off combine numbers and highlights or potential. That is where you get screwed, combine is just to confirm numbers on guys that you feel can play. Not designed to make new assumptions on how tall, fast, long, smart, whatever  they are..... No offense to Latimer, Richardosn, Bryant and others that are getting rumored higher now. They have skill but were looked at as 2-3 rd prospects just 1-2 months ago. I still take Jordan Mathews over all of them, don't let numbers play tricks on your eyes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He us a guy who gets paid lots to evaluate talent....something must here really think they are capable of doing.

Hes paid to generate content.

He has never shown any ability for evaluating talent or predicting a draft successfully.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mcshay's latest mock is like a nightmare scenario for us. He has 7 wr/te, 7cb/s, and 5ot gone by our pick. Moses is gone at 12.

 

 

 

can you post that?   that sound incredible.  He doesn't think teams will go for qb's and pass rushers?  I guess they could and all the other picks are .....no way, no way 7 dbs get picked before us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mcshay's latest mock is like a nightmare scenario for us. He has 7 wr/te, 7cb/s, and 5ot gone by our pick. Moses is gone at 12.

Then we trade back with QB needy team for more ammo. Could also take my longtime crush ASJ who I still think can/will be Gronk 2.0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...