Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. If that’s true it’s the smartest thing he’s done yet. Giving them a fair shot and repairing the reputation while setting up for a fresh start the right way for once. We can only hope that Jim Caldwell is gone too
  3. Alot of that is because he has the offensive genius the previous poster was referencing as his OC.
  4. We are absolutely fugged if Bryce Young doesn't massively improve next year. For all the hate I spew out about Bryce Young, I really wish the guy would just be good. He can do it. Drop back, plant your foot, and throw the damn ball dude.
  5. Holding out hope for a Mahomes type player to hit is farfetched. Hoping to draft a Mahomes is closer to winning the lottery than finding a good starter as even top 10 QB picks still fail 50%+ of the time (looking at you BY). There's maybe 1 Mahomes level player every 10–15 years and the chance we pick one is 1 in 2,500.
  6. This is a fair point, but I think people are forgetting just how bad the 49ers were back then. They were getting a top 5 pick every year for like a decade. Alex Smith was selected by the worst team in football. Bryce Young MADE US the worst team in football. Huge difference.
  7. IMO this is spot on. I don't see any player that we let walk that will make us worse if we let him go.
  8. Two functional human beings actually voted for option 10?
  9. It's 100% part of the problem. I am not saying we don't need upgrades. Of course we do. That said, we had a two touchdown lead ONCE in the ENTIRE season. One time. That's insanity. It absolutely sets the defense up to fail when you have garbage time of possession and can never get a lead that affords them the luxury of playing aggressively.
  10. We've never seen them outside of the structure of two very well ran organizations I'll give you that. And yes they are long in the tooth. I do think they are more than capable of getting a franchise turned around in short term capacity though. They are by no means a long term solution.
  11. You're not making a good-faith argument by blaming literally everything on the quarterback when the defense gave him a fat 38 seconds to overcome its ineptitude, but it seems you're dead-set on blaming him for any problem the team encounters. In this case, it's not warranted. Sometimes it is. But he had no time to throw (pressured on 46% of all dropbacks, an insane amount) and that's simply not all his fault -- particularly when they rush 4 or less and are in the backfield in 1.5s or less. Should we have gotten more than 0 yards? Sure! But he hit a WR in the hands on fourth down and it was dropped. Not his fault. He missed one throw on second down but I attribute first down to a bad play call and third down to poor pass protection. I would've called some quick slants, personally, but it really seems you're saying: - playcalling: Bryce's fault - poor pass protection: Bryce's fault - defensive choking away a lead: Bryce's fault, not the defense - Horn dropping a pass: Bryce's fault It's a great way to garner support on here, because when it comes to Bryce, logic takes such a backseat to context that it's not even in the same vehicle. Plenty of games can be attributed to him. Can't take anyone seriously who solely blames him for that one.
  12. I don't see how you can logically make that argument when the team beat two of the top teams in the entire league during the regular season. Now imagine the additional games we would have won against absolute tip top competitors like SF and SEA had we had a professional QB. You can throw any random stat at the problem you want, but the proof is in the pudding. We all watched it live. This roster would have produced 13 wins (wins against SF and SEA, two wins against NO, and would have swept the Bucs) and (almost certainly) a #1 seed with a remotely competent QB. Those were not games where we needed an all star performance to win. Those were games where a very, very modest stat line would have netted us an easy win. Nearly every measurable aspect of the team would have been significantly improved with a competent QB.
  13. He was there for 18 years. Pretty sure he had a part of the roster construction.
  14. It works if the genius is also a defensive mind. But Harbaugh and Tomlin aren't either.
  15. Do we still get draft comp if EE leaves by being hired elsewhere, since he was still under contract? Win-win for us. We get out from under Evero's system and gain draft capital.
  16. And has the same number of postseason wins as the Panthers have over the last 8 years - 0. And that is with a consistently good defense.
  17. Mike MacDonald is doing quite well in Seattle. Former defensive coordinator under Harbaugh.
  18. Yes they do. Any team that wants to hire him would have to work out compensation with the Steelers.
  19. evero doesn't even do a good job of disguising his blitzes. almost every time there is a blitz, we all know who the blitzers are. there was a nickel and safety overload blitz during the rams game that Stafford saw creeping up prior to the snap and he immediately adjusted his protection towards them. no pre snap adjustments were made from our side and the blitzers were immediately picked up
  20. meh. Mike McDaniel is supposed to be a scheme genius but he couldn’t command a locker room. Vrabel is similar to the so called dinosaurs and is killing it. Harbaugh in LA as well, he just needs to figure out the offense. Some teams need a strong, iron fist presence as a head coach to set the standard and demand excellence.
  21. The Panthers should have been drafting OL from jump street. All this salary cap (most in the NFL) in the group and we needed every little thing to go right for us to win the division and get a playoff spot as we lost 6 out of our last 8 games.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...