-
Posts
9,753 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Huddle Wiki
Forums
Gallery
Everything posted by Waldo
-
PFF grade on throws past first read since 2019
Waldo replied to raleigh-panther's topic in Carolina Panthers
But if they didn't play for a team you like then it doesn't count! At this point I just don't know what our brain trust likes or thinks. Hopefully one of those guys will be available. -
Dan Patrick: Panthers interested in trading for Sam Darnold
Waldo replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
Wildcat time! -
The other guy was also obviously familiar with boxing technique. Still, that was a huge boy, had a foot on the other guy at least and was still as wide as the stocky guy who knocked him out. Being huge but slow and sloppy is not going to work against anyone who knows what they are doing and look in better shape.
-
Bucky Brooks won't be sucked into Mac's meteoric rise
Waldo replied to top dawg's topic in Carolina Panthers
It's funny because of the ridiculous situation. Jones going 3rd for a mammoth haul? What could go wrong... Brooks isn't some great talent evaluator, he is just an ex-player doing mocks in the offseason filling dead air. Pretty much entertainment value only. -
Great takes and the most reasonable and realistic assessments of the QB crop this year I have witnessed yet. Tape over noise and BS, love it! Most of the main stream stuff is overhype and grandiose garbage.
-
Houston police opening investigation on Deshaun Watson
Waldo replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
Police open an investigation into a 20+ plaintif civil suit within its jurisdiction? Surprise or am I supposed to belive that it doesn't take 20+ legal accusations in Texas to get thr police's attention on a possible horrendous repeat criminal activity? This is a long ways from truly shedding light on everything. It's big but all of this still reeks from every angle. It just drips WTF? I hope any victims get justice. I have no idea what that means right now. This particular action is hardly surprising given the scope of the allegations. At some point there is going to be a list of facts but this is still not that point. Regardless, NFL radioactive. The only positive here is that it had zero to do with Carolina football. -
I don't believe we'll take a QB on day 2 no matter what
Waldo replied to top dawg's topic in Carolina Panthers
Non-starter quality either way. Might as well go cheap and see what happens. -
M&M: QBs we are not talking about much (Mond/Mills)
Waldo replied to MHS831's topic in Carolina Panthers
I would take either LT and not blink. I don't get the Darnold love. I'm fine with a prove it deal out of free agency just not giving up any draft capital for a guy with that much bad film. One is a flyer approach and the other is overspending on a warm body who is an extreme longshot. -
M&M: QBs we are not talking about much (Mond/Mills)
Waldo replied to MHS831's topic in Carolina Panthers
I agree on the first part not the second part tho. Either the Jets cut Darnold this year or next, at least the draft picks haven't proved how bad they are in the NFL yet. Plus they are cheaper. Very likely none of them are the answer at the end of it all. I would rather draft an OG in the 3rd 10 out of 10 times then send it for Darnold. -
M&M: QBs we are not talking about much (Mond/Mills)
Waldo replied to MHS831's topic in Carolina Panthers
As long as we pick a LT and a CB before this, whatever follows is whatever at that point. If we do pick a QB, at least play them enough in 2021 to know if we still need a starter and not that purgatory he could be the guy but he hasn't played BS. -
If you don't eat then you don't have to poo.
-
I mostly notice the corn on it's way out. Good luck!
-
Tony Pauline: Panthers sleeper team to trade for Sam Darnold
Waldo replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
I'll take him as a free agent on a prove it deal. -
Tony Pauline: Panthers sleeper team to trade for Sam Darnold
Waldo replied to TheSpecialJuan's topic in Carolina Panthers
This would be 2 bad QB moves in 2 years. Just stop, a trade is only good for the Jets. If they release him then fine, but fug giving up any draft capital for him. I wouldn't even trade a 6th or 7th at this point for him. -
If he isn't healthy enough then you can't rely on him. KK being healthy would be the exception, it's time to go elsewhere.
-
The D improved by leaps throughout the year despite limited roster with positives, looked good at times and showed a lot to look forward to. Even with the additions so far this offseason, it's looking like another step in the right direction. Our D outplayed our O last year, as a unit and statistically. Link Brady has some prove it to do this year. I hope he does but so far it's TBD at best. Snow proved a lot of my fears about him wrong. Garoppollo is a backup level QB that the 49ers overpaid for. The fact he had to sit for 6 months after being in the league 3 years should have been a huge red flag. Really weird hill to try and defend. He had one year where he played 16 games and at the age of 28 and he looked like an area where that team could improve even if he could stay healthy, his 6th year in the NFL. Link
-
Sitting doesn't fix bad coaching or bad team management. It just delays the inevitable. Look at our D last year, good coaching make a huge difference and makes it worth playing the young guys even if it sucks early. Each prospect is a little different but if they are not having immense issues in camp then sitting shouldn't be the go-to move just because they are young. There are tons of 1st rounders that flame out or become backups because of terrible situations and the fact that is who they always where regardless of who picked them where. Once we get an actual QB, then it's way more specific and less theoretical. Garoppollo was a huge mistake conceptually and the fact he had to sit for 6 months with the niners says more about him and that mistake then the process you are supporting. R Wilson went in the 3rd round, started all 16 games his rookie year and didn't need to sit. Cam did it as the 1st pick. We won't know if they have to sit until we know they need to sit. We are perfectly fine simplifying for a young QB, last year wasn't very impressive offensively. Looked like we relied on the talent at WR to bail us out, mixed in with good old power running once CMC went down. Pretty basic really, lots of dump offs and guys open deep. I hope to see the complex side, it's just not going to happen until we have more talent at QB and on the oline.
-
Good comps. I keep forgetting how much more R Wilson ran in college. Watson is intriguing but there is something about Fields' game that is different that's bugging me but don't know what.
-
I think Cam lite. Cam was power and Fields looks a good bit less physical. Both have an arm but Cam looked stronger. Fields has some great speed. I'll go with Cam lite. I don't know much about his personality, looked like he had fun with the other players a bit like Cam did from what I have seen.