Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We shouldve drafted him. Should try to trade for him.


Recommended Posts

Use a player and portlands pick please try. This kid is a stud we shouldve drafted him. Giannis Antetokounmpo. If you don't know him, look him up because you should. I'd trade MKG/Hendo and a 1st for him hell maybe throw in a 2nd this kid has potential through the roof and an insane work ethic. I'm calling it now, he will be an all star in this league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Bucks value Giannis the way we value Kemba. They won't let him go.

 

 

The Greek Freak is something special, we could always take a flyer on his bro in this years draft with our second pick.

 

 

He's a bad boy!

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/from-selling-sunglasses-on-street-to-nba-player-on-the-rise--greek-freak-living-the-american-dream-214309752.html

 

this article i read made him an instant top 5 favorite player of mine in the league and i got a lot of respect for the man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem is that you will probably STILL be waiting 5 seasons from now.

Guy has little to no offensive game and one of the ugliest jump shots I have ever seen.

Not true. He is a good ball handler, passer slasher and finisher at the rim. All of this is part of offense. So him not having any offensive game is false.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right. I didn’t think it was good either but the QB sure did. He was the defacto number one target, not Chark, was my point.
    • We could quibble about was that an answer to what I asked but I  don’t see it as being one. Look, he agreed to this Evero thing. Up front. Apparently anyway. Took the job with those conditions in place. I buy that and will work off of it.  This play calling issue isn’t the same thing. I am not in the mood to delve into Canales’ shortcomings and get out the pitchforks at the moment. I will abstain from that topic and stick to the quandary the dissenters who want to usurp his play calling power, find themselves in. As far as that goes I am still on the fence and think the play calling is Bryce centric and the play selection/playbook is affected. That does not mean I know that if the playbook was open he would be great play caller. Just that he is hampered right now.  Inserting an OC not of Canales’ approval changes the original parameters of the assumed agreement.  Unless you think Tepper placed a contractual prescription to allow Tepper to dictate that he can insert a play caller of his choosing after a time period if he is not satisfied with Canales’ work.  Which, do you really think that is in play?  I do not.    Unless it is, Canales has the option to yea or nay. As I said, it could be forced on him. But they only do that if they want him out.  And as of now his stock is up, I would have to say I don’t own any but I think it is up. He had the stadium rocking, the team in the playoffs, and has that sorry lil draft pick trending upward. Even at this very low rate.  I think he has ‘hand’ right now as they say on Seinfeld. This is something that may get play in the 2026 season, not now. IMO.     
×
×
  • Create New...