Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you want this much Science and Technology in Football?


Recommended Posts

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/2014/06/ncsu-researchers-develop-system-to-better.html

 

 

football-photo*600xx2937-1958-75-0.jpg

 

 

 

 

Being a game of inches, that challenge can sometimes affect the outcome of a game. Referees are sometimes left to guess how far a player advanced the ball, affecting a third-down conversion, or even a touchdown call. Researchers at N.C. State University say they might have a solution to the problem. In collaboration with Carnegie Mellon University and Disney Research, scientists have developed a system that can track a football in three-dimensional space using low-frequency magnetic fields, particularly useful when the ball is blocked from view. Using high-frequency waves to track a football isn’t a new concept, but the problem with previous versions of the idea was that the players’ bodies would absorb those waves, making it impossible to accurately track the ball.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The world cup is implementing technology to detect when a ball crosses the goal line. This is something the NFL should've done years ago. If Goodell wanted to make a name for himself, instead of changing all the fuging rules of football, all he had to do was drive the NFL into the technological age. He would've been way more liked than he is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still not sure why they haven't implemented something that tracks where the ball is on the field. It really wouldn't be that hard to implement, and refs need to be making way less decisions.

Maybe for the same reason that baseball has stayed away feom technology..they feel it takes aaway from the game. People love drama and controversy as much as they love the game. Remember that Seahawks touchdown 2 years ago they won on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me old school but the refs are as much a part of the game as the players.

 

Next everyone will wear sensors and detect holding and all other penalties.

 

Leave it alone.  We got replay when they screw up a spot but for the most part they get it right.

 

The refs are only there to make sure the game is played the way it should. Technology would help them enforce that and get it right way more often than they ever would alone. If you are a true football fan, you would want the game to be as pure as you want it without monumental human errors. Even with replay, refs still royally screw it up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait till we replace the players with robots that never retire or get tired. Football 24/7!!!

Wow, I bet you oppose cell phones, internet, tv, radio x and birth control because we haven't always had those

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refs are only there to make sure the game is played the way it should. Technology would help them enforce that and get it right way more often than they ever would alone. If you are a true football fan, you would want the game to be as pure as you want it without monumental human errors. Even with replay, refs still royally screw it up.

 

 

And what guarantee do you have that one punt of the football or one Steve Smith spin doesn't throw it out of whack by a inch or two or more.

 

You can't.  The spotting of the football is pretty good for the most part.  Occasionally they do a  lousy job of spotting it. And if it is that bad they challenge it.  I would say 7-10 challenges are upheld and the team loses a timeout.

 

Leave it alone.  Not worth the headache.

 

Typical huddle response.  Your not a true fan if you don't agree with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
    • Very true on the length but stuff like this is never where we shine. We aren’t a good team at drafting.
    • Homerism aside, the more I see from Dan, the more impressed I am.  His player evaluation instincts. Last year his 2 premier FA signings, Hunt and Lewis COMPLETELY changed the line and I have a feeling his success in choosing blue chip guys will continue.  Look at the panthers’s rep for FA signings in the past. By and large, it’s been guys 1 year past their prime who had an injury and suckered our GM in to a crippling contract. We never get nice things. When was the last time this team signed 2 young blue chip studs  in the same offseason to contracts worthy of their impact? Ever?  Im telling y’all, players respect and trust Morgan. 
×
×
  • Create New...