Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you want this much Science and Technology in Football?


Recommended Posts

http://www.bizjournals.com/triangle/blog/2014/06/ncsu-researchers-develop-system-to-better.html

 

 

football-photo*600xx2937-1958-75-0.jpg

 

 

 

 

Being a game of inches, that challenge can sometimes affect the outcome of a game. Referees are sometimes left to guess how far a player advanced the ball, affecting a third-down conversion, or even a touchdown call. Researchers at N.C. State University say they might have a solution to the problem. In collaboration with Carnegie Mellon University and Disney Research, scientists have developed a system that can track a football in three-dimensional space using low-frequency magnetic fields, particularly useful when the ball is blocked from view. Using high-frequency waves to track a football isn’t a new concept, but the problem with previous versions of the idea was that the players’ bodies would absorb those waves, making it impossible to accurately track the ball.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The world cup is implementing technology to detect when a ball crosses the goal line. This is something the NFL should've done years ago. If Goodell wanted to make a name for himself, instead of changing all the fuging rules of football, all he had to do was drive the NFL into the technological age. He would've been way more liked than he is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still not sure why they haven't implemented something that tracks where the ball is on the field. It really wouldn't be that hard to implement, and refs need to be making way less decisions.

Maybe for the same reason that baseball has stayed away feom technology..they feel it takes aaway from the game. People love drama and controversy as much as they love the game. Remember that Seahawks touchdown 2 years ago they won on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Call me old school but the refs are as much a part of the game as the players.

 

Next everyone will wear sensors and detect holding and all other penalties.

 

Leave it alone.  We got replay when they screw up a spot but for the most part they get it right.

 

The refs are only there to make sure the game is played the way it should. Technology would help them enforce that and get it right way more often than they ever would alone. If you are a true football fan, you would want the game to be as pure as you want it without monumental human errors. Even with replay, refs still royally screw it up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't wait till we replace the players with robots that never retire or get tired. Football 24/7!!!

Wow, I bet you oppose cell phones, internet, tv, radio x and birth control because we haven't always had those

Sent from my XT1080 using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The refs are only there to make sure the game is played the way it should. Technology would help them enforce that and get it right way more often than they ever would alone. If you are a true football fan, you would want the game to be as pure as you want it without monumental human errors. Even with replay, refs still royally screw it up.

 

 

And what guarantee do you have that one punt of the football or one Steve Smith spin doesn't throw it out of whack by a inch or two or more.

 

You can't.  The spotting of the football is pretty good for the most part.  Occasionally they do a  lousy job of spotting it. And if it is that bad they challenge it.  I would say 7-10 challenges are upheld and the team loses a timeout.

 

Leave it alone.  Not worth the headache.

 

Typical huddle response.  Your not a true fan if you don't agree with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
    • That TD pass to Legette against Miami. Elite. The play where Bryce rolls right to buy time until Tet can reverse field.  Bryce pumps as multiple defenders close in.  He barely gets it away before he takes a big time hit.  Beautiful off platform throw and great catch by Tet.   The second TD to Tet against Dallas where Bryce dips and turns his shoulder in to evade the pass rusher.  Resets and finds Tet in the end zone. Dude embodies the Keep Pounding mantra.  
×
×
  • Create New...